Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DogBackward" data-source="post: 3591744" data-attributes="member: 50642">First of all, and this is not meant to be malicious, but when you Quote a long post like that, it's generally a good idea to shorten it, and just add a "..." in there. Presumably, everybody reading your post has already read mine, and repeating that much text wastes space.Second, yeah I did read his post. I never played that character, actually, though Stormclaw was a favorite weapon of one of my old characters. He asked for a big-time damage dealing meatshield, and I gave him several options to go that direction. He said he could use one non-core thing per level, so even if he decides to use all of my non-core suggestions, he should be fine if the game is a high enough level (a number he neglected to mention, so I didn't know what I was working with there). I'll admit, I did spend a little more space on the "meat shield" part than the "damage dealing" part, but that's the part I had the most ideas on. If you have that huge AC and HP total, you'll be around much longer to bash someone's face in. A Warblade has some good damage-dealing maneuvers, so those would help. And with Power Attack, if you take it, that Crit with Stormclaw would smack just about anything down.So, really, what was your problem with my post?As for mithral and WOTC's rulings, they're not exactly known for using anything resembling sense there, to be honest. Mithral armor is still bulky and still has a large enough area to benefit from such things, it's just lighter. Of course, any DM might rule against that, but that's his right, I guess.</blockquote>

Verification