Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Targeting "closest enemy" with curses, powers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AGFlynn" data-source="post: 4301494" data-attributes="member: 17562"><p>I'm not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere, but in putting together my first 4e Warlock I realized that the curse and a number of other powers allow a character to target only their <em>closest</em> enemy on any given round.</p><p>I find this a bit mystifying as I try to imagine it in play. That means my Warlock can't target, for example, the big boss standing two squares away but one square behind and to the left of his minion. Why the hell not? There's a clear line of sight, no cover and he's nice and close. </p><p>Sure, the warlock only has to shift a couple squares and the big guy's the closest. No big deal.</p><p>But a savvy DM will make sure the big guy positions himself whenever possible so that nobody can make him the closest target.</p><p>So my warlock is likely going to be denied one of the most potent tools in his arsenal just about all the time. In 1 square wide corridors, or just about anywhere tight, he will almost never be able to move into position to use the curse, since the tanks will be in there up close and personal, taking up squares that could give the warlock the proximity he needs.</p><p>I find that a massive limitation to the class. I have this great power that is central to my character's combat effectiveness, but in many situations I won't be able to use it.</p><p>This must have come up in playtesting. I certainly hope that in the errata such things will be given a short range rather than the "closest" requirement. I'll be sure the asking my group to house rule this one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AGFlynn, post: 4301494, member: 17562"] I'm not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere, but in putting together my first 4e Warlock I realized that the curse and a number of other powers allow a character to target only their [I]closest[/I] enemy on any given round. I find this a bit mystifying as I try to imagine it in play. That means my Warlock can't target, for example, the big boss standing two squares away but one square behind and to the left of his minion. Why the hell not? There's a clear line of sight, no cover and he's nice and close. Sure, the warlock only has to shift a couple squares and the big guy's the closest. No big deal. But a savvy DM will make sure the big guy positions himself whenever possible so that nobody can make him the closest target. So my warlock is likely going to be denied one of the most potent tools in his arsenal just about all the time. In 1 square wide corridors, or just about anywhere tight, he will almost never be able to move into position to use the curse, since the tanks will be in there up close and personal, taking up squares that could give the warlock the proximity he needs. I find that a massive limitation to the class. I have this great power that is central to my character's combat effectiveness, but in many situations I won't be able to use it. This must have come up in playtesting. I certainly hope that in the errata such things will be given a short range rather than the "closest" requirement. I'll be sure the asking my group to house rule this one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Targeting "closest enemy" with curses, powers
Top