Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tedium for balance. Should we balance powerful effects with bookkeeping?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fanaelialae" data-source="post: 9122777" data-attributes="member: 53980"><p>My take on this is that more people preferred a faster-paced, reduced-tedium game and the designers listened. If lots of people didn't enjoy those changes, then it wouldn't be as popular as it is. </p><p></p><p>I mean, how dare the game designers create a game that lots of people enjoy!? They might as well be reaching their greedy little mitts directly into my wallet and helping themselves to the contents thereof! The sheer temerity of it all! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Back in the day, there were dramatically fewer options if the style of a game didn't suit your preferences. Even if the game existed, good luck actually finding a copy unless you had a FLGS in your neighborhood that could get it for you. I didn't, and I remember reading and re-reading Rick Swan's Complete Guide to Role-playing Games as a kid, dreaming of being able to own many of the games described therein. That probably is a significant root cause of why, now that I can order games online, I literally need to add a whole lot more shelving to my office soon because I have stacks of RPG books on the floor reaching almost as high as my waist. It's a nice problem to have. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>No game can serve all interests. Back in the older editions, my groups house ruled things to increase the pace. We had more generous rates of natural healing (often something like level + Con HP bonus recovery for long rests) and allowed the creation of non-magical healing balms that cured 1d3 HP, which we stock piled. We allowed leveling mid-adventure. It didn't fix the issues, but it ameliorated them a bit. Nowadays, my group is happy with the pace and doesn't need house rules for them, whereas it sounds like you do (if you want to achieve the style of game you're looking for in 5e, at any rate). </p><p></p><p>There are in fact a considerable number of games based on 5e that do bring the game into a slower-paced and/or resource-oriented play style. Into the Unknown, Five Torches Deep, King of Dungeons, Adventures in Middle Earth. Moreover, there are a considerable number of fantastic games in that space that aren't based on 5e, such as Worlds Without Number (which just released Cities Without Number if you're looking to do a Cyberpunk/Shadowrun-esque game), Into the Unknown, and Ultraviolet Grasslands. If the folks you're playing with aren't interested in those kinds of games, then I dare say the issue is simply that of a difference of play preferences.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fanaelialae, post: 9122777, member: 53980"] My take on this is that more people preferred a faster-paced, reduced-tedium game and the designers listened. If lots of people didn't enjoy those changes, then it wouldn't be as popular as it is. I mean, how dare the game designers create a game that lots of people enjoy!? They might as well be reaching their greedy little mitts directly into my wallet and helping themselves to the contents thereof! The sheer temerity of it all! ;) Back in the day, there were dramatically fewer options if the style of a game didn't suit your preferences. Even if the game existed, good luck actually finding a copy unless you had a FLGS in your neighborhood that could get it for you. I didn't, and I remember reading and re-reading Rick Swan's Complete Guide to Role-playing Games as a kid, dreaming of being able to own many of the games described therein. That probably is a significant root cause of why, now that I can order games online, I literally need to add a whole lot more shelving to my office soon because I have stacks of RPG books on the floor reaching almost as high as my waist. It's a nice problem to have. :) No game can serve all interests. Back in the older editions, my groups house ruled things to increase the pace. We had more generous rates of natural healing (often something like level + Con HP bonus recovery for long rests) and allowed the creation of non-magical healing balms that cured 1d3 HP, which we stock piled. We allowed leveling mid-adventure. It didn't fix the issues, but it ameliorated them a bit. Nowadays, my group is happy with the pace and doesn't need house rules for them, whereas it sounds like you do (if you want to achieve the style of game you're looking for in 5e, at any rate). There are in fact a considerable number of games based on 5e that do bring the game into a slower-paced and/or resource-oriented play style. Into the Unknown, Five Torches Deep, King of Dungeons, Adventures in Middle Earth. Moreover, there are a considerable number of fantastic games in that space that aren't based on 5e, such as Worlds Without Number (which just released Cities Without Number if you're looking to do a Cyberpunk/Shadowrun-esque game), Into the Unknown, and Ultraviolet Grasslands. If the folks you're playing with aren't interested in those kinds of games, then I dare say the issue is simply that of a difference of play preferences. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tedium for balance. Should we balance powerful effects with bookkeeping?
Top