Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AaronOfBarbaria" data-source="post: 6834375" data-attributes="member: 6701872">I never said it was.I've gone into as much detail as I can; I run 5th edition the way it is written, without any baggage brought over from prior editions, and the problems [MENTION=6716779]Zardnaar[/MENTION] mentions experiencing at his games do not occur in mine.The only thing that I am likely to be doing differently is not expecting that the "balance point" of the game was intended to be at the same place that others might expect it to be - which is why someone can say something like "foresight + great weapon master = broken game" and I can respond with "No, that's just teamwork - and is also actually limited in usage, both in the way of which parties can do that combo and how often the combo can be utilized when it is possessed by the party."See, here's the thing... I'm not even saying that you, or anyone else, hasn't broken the game.I'm just pointing out that the things which have been claimed as evidence that the game universally breaks that aren't actually universal, and using the data point of my own group not having our game broken by those specific things (or anything thus far) as the proof.As for people finding the same thing... you seem to be implying that's not true of my position as well, and that's not the case even in just this thread.</blockquote>