Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kanegrundar" data-source="post: 2252880" data-attributes="member: 3913">Here's my 2 cents on C&C.Overall it's a easy to use system, but it removes a LOT of the things that I feel were the big draws to 3E.  PC's of the same class are pretty much the same.  There isn't really any customization built into the core rules.  Classes get most of their powers at level 1, so there is little to look forward to in gaining levels (beyond hp's, skill bonuses, and such) unless you're playing a spellcaster.  Sure, C&C is easy to houserule, but once I get done hoseruling everything I want in the game, I might as well play a slightly stripped down version of 3.5.I don't understand the move from 3, easy to discern when they need to be used saving throws, to 5.  The saves in C&C are easy to use, but why break it down how ealier D&D editions did it?  That was a step backwards IMO.  Like I said, it's a simple go-between from 1E and 3E.  However, you need to put serious emphasis on the simple.  If that's what you're looking for, great, but I'll stick to D&D 3.5.  Kane</blockquote>