Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Tell me about Castles and Crusades
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gideon_thorne" data-source="post: 2046722" data-attributes="member: 17896"><p>The rules are actually neither inconsistent or incomplete. They might seem that way to those used to more complex systems, but C&C as it stands, especially the boxed set, can be played as is with no modification. There are plenty of classes and races to work with for the beginner.</p><p></p><p>Its all these 'extras' that break away from the baseline of the classes require modification.</p><p></p><p>The desire to play classes that stretch away from the baseline classes does not translate into a flaw in the C&C game. These non baseline classes certainly are for more experienced gamers. For a newbie, learning the system, they have no place as part of a 'baseline core game' and therefore in no way constitute an 'incompleteness' or inconsistency about the game itself.</p><p></p><p>Most of what is talked about as 'incomplete' or 'missing' is from the perspective of experienced gamers who know how to ask the questions, back in the day, the newbie didn't really know the difference.</p><p></p><p>So..the system may be incomplete for YOU but not for most everyone else playing it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As for the polymorph spell Fiff summs it up here:</p><p></p><p><em>I wrote the original draft of polymorph. It changed a bit from what I submitted (my version was much more harsh, lest anyone think the Trolls aren't sympathetic to the plight of the players).</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>However, one thing I can comment on here is that PCs are different in C&C from everything else. Things that apply to PCs don't necessarily apply to NPCs, and most definitely don't apply to monsters.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>One thing that has to be understood is that Not Everything Has To Play By The Same Rules.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>This means monsters don't have to have attributes, and NPCs don't have to follow the same character rules as PCs, as long as the CK is reasonable about it.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Now, back to polymorph. It's assumed that if a monstrous shape is assumed, the character in essence *becomes* that monster.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Forget your character sheet. It's worthless except to know what equipment you're carrying.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>If you're polymorphed into a giant, it's futile to figure out what your character's stats as a giant will be. Just use the Giant's stats. Adjust AC and base attack for any armor or special equipment, and voila - you're done.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Ability scores aren't necessary - they are assumed as part of the Giant's stats already. For saving throws, the PC would no longer use PC saving throws, but monster saving throws - Physical and Mental. If the character loses his mind, then a Giant would represent Physical saves, while a character with a Wis or Int prime that retains his consciousness would have both Physical and Mental saves in the new form.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Other than that, your character sheet is basically a Giant's statblock until you are transformed back.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Some of the problem here is the "square peg in round hole" syndrome, where folks try to put the structure of a PC onto a monster's form. That's where the fallacy occurs. Once it's realized and absorbed that not everything has to have the same structure as a PC, things get a LOT easier.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Fiffergrund, Margrave of Shotwick</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gideon_thorne, post: 2046722, member: 17896"] The rules are actually neither inconsistent or incomplete. They might seem that way to those used to more complex systems, but C&C as it stands, especially the boxed set, can be played as is with no modification. There are plenty of classes and races to work with for the beginner. Its all these 'extras' that break away from the baseline of the classes require modification. The desire to play classes that stretch away from the baseline classes does not translate into a flaw in the C&C game. These non baseline classes certainly are for more experienced gamers. For a newbie, learning the system, they have no place as part of a 'baseline core game' and therefore in no way constitute an 'incompleteness' or inconsistency about the game itself. Most of what is talked about as 'incomplete' or 'missing' is from the perspective of experienced gamers who know how to ask the questions, back in the day, the newbie didn't really know the difference. So..the system may be incomplete for YOU but not for most everyone else playing it. :) As for the polymorph spell Fiff summs it up here: [I]I wrote the original draft of polymorph. It changed a bit from what I submitted (my version was much more harsh, lest anyone think the Trolls aren't sympathetic to the plight of the players). However, one thing I can comment on here is that PCs are different in C&C from everything else. Things that apply to PCs don't necessarily apply to NPCs, and most definitely don't apply to monsters. One thing that has to be understood is that Not Everything Has To Play By The Same Rules. This means monsters don't have to have attributes, and NPCs don't have to follow the same character rules as PCs, as long as the CK is reasonable about it. Now, back to polymorph. It's assumed that if a monstrous shape is assumed, the character in essence *becomes* that monster. Forget your character sheet. It's worthless except to know what equipment you're carrying. If you're polymorphed into a giant, it's futile to figure out what your character's stats as a giant will be. Just use the Giant's stats. Adjust AC and base attack for any armor or special equipment, and voila - you're done. Ability scores aren't necessary - they are assumed as part of the Giant's stats already. For saving throws, the PC would no longer use PC saving throws, but monster saving throws - Physical and Mental. If the character loses his mind, then a Giant would represent Physical saves, while a character with a Wis or Int prime that retains his consciousness would have both Physical and Mental saves in the new form. Other than that, your character sheet is basically a Giant's statblock until you are transformed back. Some of the problem here is the "square peg in round hole" syndrome, where folks try to put the structure of a PC onto a monster's form. That's where the fallacy occurs. Once it's realized and absorbed that not everything has to have the same structure as a PC, things get a LOT easier. Fiffergrund, Margrave of Shotwick[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Tell me about Castles and Crusades
Top