Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Tell me about Castles and Crusades
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bolie" data-source="post: 2046899" data-attributes="member: 8312"><p>For the record, I have not argued that C&C or d20 is better. I have been pointing what I consider flaws in C&C in answer to the question "Tell me about C&C." Others have pointed out its strengths. I've even pointed out some strengths...</p><p></p><p>I responded to that comment on polymorph and giants on the Troll Lords message board. To sum up, he's wrong. Monsters don't use different mechanics. They use exactly the same mechanics (d20 rolls to hit, AC, hit points, SEIGE engine for skills/saves).</p><p></p><p>Having said that, if polymorph is intended to give the subject the monster's exact stats, nothing more and nothing less (with a couple of exceptions like spells if the new form has the appropriate parts), then that's fine. That's not at all what the spell says. So the spell description should be changed in the reprint and the errata.</p><p></p><p>I've pointed out several specific ways in which the C&C rules are internally inconsistent and haven't seen any explanation of how I'm wrong other than "Uh uh, they are not!" or in the case of polymorph the answers haven't really addressed my comments.</p><p></p><p>The "extras" that I've been talking about consist of one basic spell, spellcasting in general, charging in combat, and overbearing. If these are intended to be extras or optional, they should be labeled as such. But either way, the rules given should be more clear. As written, they have errors or inconsistencies or are incomplete.</p><p></p><p>I'm not out to insult anyone or denigrate anyone. If people like C&C, that's fine. I know (obviously from these threads) that there are people who don't really care how well the rules hang together, they don't care to follow them anyway. There's nothing wrong with that. Those people won't be interested in my comments because they will be moot to how they play. People who do try to follow the rules or who like messing with the system will find the same things I'm finding. Some will fix them and move on without a problem. Others won't want to or will be annoyed like me.</p><p></p><p>This thread is about C&C and sharing experiences. I've discussed my experiences with C&C. I'll freely admit that having a good DM has made a big difference. Not everyone has a good DM (you can't always be choosy).</p><p></p><p>Bolie IV</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bolie, post: 2046899, member: 8312"] For the record, I have not argued that C&C or d20 is better. I have been pointing what I consider flaws in C&C in answer to the question "Tell me about C&C." Others have pointed out its strengths. I've even pointed out some strengths... I responded to that comment on polymorph and giants on the Troll Lords message board. To sum up, he's wrong. Monsters don't use different mechanics. They use exactly the same mechanics (d20 rolls to hit, AC, hit points, SEIGE engine for skills/saves). Having said that, if polymorph is intended to give the subject the monster's exact stats, nothing more and nothing less (with a couple of exceptions like spells if the new form has the appropriate parts), then that's fine. That's not at all what the spell says. So the spell description should be changed in the reprint and the errata. I've pointed out several specific ways in which the C&C rules are internally inconsistent and haven't seen any explanation of how I'm wrong other than "Uh uh, they are not!" or in the case of polymorph the answers haven't really addressed my comments. The "extras" that I've been talking about consist of one basic spell, spellcasting in general, charging in combat, and overbearing. If these are intended to be extras or optional, they should be labeled as such. But either way, the rules given should be more clear. As written, they have errors or inconsistencies or are incomplete. I'm not out to insult anyone or denigrate anyone. If people like C&C, that's fine. I know (obviously from these threads) that there are people who don't really care how well the rules hang together, they don't care to follow them anyway. There's nothing wrong with that. Those people won't be interested in my comments because they will be moot to how they play. People who do try to follow the rules or who like messing with the system will find the same things I'm finding. Some will fix them and move on without a problem. Others won't want to or will be annoyed like me. This thread is about C&C and sharing experiences. I've discussed my experiences with C&C. I'll freely admit that having a good DM has made a big difference. Not everyone has a good DM (you can't always be choosy). Bolie IV [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Tell me about Castles and Crusades
Top