Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mad Hatter" data-source="post: 2649578" data-attributes="member: 23731">Takyris, I think the problem is that you categorized some of the Goodkind fans here as rabid fanboys, which is hardly the case.&nbsp; In fact, everyone here has given a reason they like Goodkind.&nbsp; So you mentioning &quot;rabid fanboys&quot; is insulting.&nbsp; I also think that it's unfair to even submit your broad categories.&nbsp; It's perfectly within your rights but that doesn't mean that it was appropriate to this particular discussion.&nbsp; I liked Goodkind's first three books.&nbsp; They weren't brilliant, but they entertained me.&nbsp; I thought his tale ended there.&nbsp; His sex was a little gratuitous, but for the most part they did advance the plot (please note the &quot;for the most part&quot;).&nbsp; The main thing for me when I stopped reading the books was that my tastes just changed dramatically.&nbsp; Of course I read them when I was 15 and I think me being a girl made the books not as good to me.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mad Hatter, post: 2649578, member: 23731"] Takyris, I think the problem is that you categorized some of the Goodkind fans here as rabid fanboys, which is hardly the case. In fact, everyone here has given a reason they like Goodkind. So you mentioning "rabid fanboys" is insulting. I also think that it's unfair to even submit your broad categories. It's perfectly within your rights but that doesn't mean that it was appropriate to this particular discussion. I liked Goodkind's first three books. They weren't brilliant, but they entertained me. I thought his tale ended there. His sex was a little gratuitous, but for the most part they did advance the plot (please note the "for the most part"). The main thing for me when I stopped reading the books was that my tastes just changed dramatically. Of course I read them when I was 15 and I think me being a girl made the books not as good to me. [/QUOTE]

Verification