Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5039267" data-attributes="member: 82106">Yes, early on CS was all over the map on the topic. That is not true anymore and hasn't been true for quite a while. They are certainly far from perfect and often come up with some fairly poor rulings on new things, things that are edge cases, or some specific areas where they seem not to want to decide. Nowadays though in well covered areas they are pretty uniformly consistent.If you ask CS about a power in regards to forced movement they WILL as of right now rule based on the enter/move distinction. Yes they have been slowly making errata to some of the most problematic cases but they have also been publishing new material with this terminology in mind. The issue is that a lot of older material was written in a haphazard way. You can't count on a power in PHB intending not to be triggered on forced movement into a zone simply because it says "move" instead of "enter". Newer material you can. In a lot of cases where it was hard to say what RAI was CS has simply come down on the side of whichever interpretation fit within their after-the-fact terminology. This isn't true in every case, but it is still the way to rule if you want to be consistent with CS and don't feel like asking them about a specific power.</blockquote>