Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SteveC" data-source="post: 2968302" data-attributes="member: 9053">Well I'm certain you believe that&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />&nbsp; and perhaps I would agree with you too. Would you care to summarize what your definition is? As a matter of fact I believe that the definitions of railroading that have been used here are completely clear to the individuals who have made them.You see, I think we can agree on this for the most part, but when you say &quot;having a villain cast a charm spell could be railroading&quot; I guess I'm really not sure where you're coming from. Suppose a player is playing a rogue on an adventure into the forgotten crypts of doom&lt;tm&gt;. Does the player have a right to call railroading on the fact that most (if not all) of their enemies in the adventure are immune to the greater part of their attack?Color me confused, but not surprised at the confusion.--Steve</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SteveC, post: 2968302, member: 9053"] Well I'm certain you believe that :) and perhaps I would agree with you too. Would you care to summarize what your definition is? As a matter of fact I believe that the definitions of railroading that have been used here are completely clear to the individuals who have made them. You see, I think we can agree on this for the most part, but when you say "having a villain cast a charm spell could be railroading" I guess I'm really not sure where you're coming from. Suppose a player is playing a rogue on an adventure into the forgotten crypts of doom<tm>. Does the player have a right to call railroading on the fact that most (if not all) of their enemies in the adventure are immune to the greater part of their attack? Color me confused, but not surprised at the confusion. --Steve [/QUOTE]

Verification