Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tempest Fighter makes me happy.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="inati" data-source="post: 4455286" data-attributes="member: 71567"><p>So, it seems you are saying that if someone who <em>wants</em> to play, for example, a Greataxe Fighter and they were in the same group as you, you would just be "miffed" at them the whole time for not being optimized for the way you envision groups?</p><p></p><p>I believe that if someone with whom I am playing with wants to play a Great Weapon Fighter, they are more than welcome to! If someone wants to play a non-optimized character for their own reasons, be they roleplay or otherwise, I would encourage it, not consider it "a disservice" to the group. This is a game that we gather to play and enjoy ourselves, with the freedom to be as creative as possible. We are given the tools to create entire worlds, for heaven's sake! It should <em>not</em> be a game where we have to worry that we must conform to the beat of someone else's drum at the table. Especially for such mundane reasons like another person's notion of "optimization," or worse, having someone "miffed" at us.</p><p></p><p>Naturally, there is a limit to how far 'nonoptimization' should go, but it is easy enough to distinguish between a$$hattery and a genuine reason.</p><p></p><p>Now, imagine that you have a son who wants to play a halfling fighter who runs around with just a dagger and no shield. He wants to because he has watched a lot of the Lord of the Rings (probably because of you) and loves the hero Frodo. Your son thinks Frodo is a fighter, not a rogue, no matter what you say to him. Would you explain to him, "No Son, halfling fighters suck. Their small size means they won't be able to move around anything bigger than a medium sized creature. Plus, you are running around with just a dagger? That is such a waste of your build! You must play with a shield. I mean, everyone knows, a shield and weapon fighter is the only real fighter in this game. Anything else is just a disservice to the group. You don't want to be a disservice to the group, do you, Son?" </p><p></p><p>Most people would not say this to their own son. I know I wouldn't. To do so would just, for all intents and purposes, effectively crush his imagination; we have now imposed artificial walls in his mind. Instead of teaching our son to be creative, we have taught him that there are limitations to that creativity. I feel that we should let him live out his fantasy in the way that he sees it, and thereby stretch the limits of that imagination and creativity. </p><p></p><p>So with this in mind, why would you <em>ever</em> say this to someone else who is using their free time to come and play D&D with you? If it is wrong to impose artificial walls upon the minds our progeny, surely other people should be afforded the same right.</p><p></p><p>Short version: Greatweapon Fighter is a build in the PHB too.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>As for this fighter build, I think it's great. A viable build for Fighters who have always wanted to dual wield and wear light armor; which it seems there is considerable interest already. Fantastic! </p><p></p><p>And now, maybe those damn light blade/high dex fighter powers will actually see the light of day. (Armor-Piercing Thrust or Rain of Blows for example.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="inati, post: 4455286, member: 71567"] So, it seems you are saying that if someone who [I]wants[/I] to play, for example, a Greataxe Fighter and they were in the same group as you, you would just be "miffed" at them the whole time for not being optimized for the way you envision groups? I believe that if someone with whom I am playing with wants to play a Great Weapon Fighter, they are more than welcome to! If someone wants to play a non-optimized character for their own reasons, be they roleplay or otherwise, I would encourage it, not consider it "a disservice" to the group. This is a game that we gather to play and enjoy ourselves, with the freedom to be as creative as possible. We are given the tools to create entire worlds, for heaven's sake! It should [I]not[/I] be a game where we have to worry that we must conform to the beat of someone else's drum at the table. Especially for such mundane reasons like another person's notion of "optimization," or worse, having someone "miffed" at us. Naturally, there is a limit to how far 'nonoptimization' should go, but it is easy enough to distinguish between a$$hattery and a genuine reason. Now, imagine that you have a son who wants to play a halfling fighter who runs around with just a dagger and no shield. He wants to because he has watched a lot of the Lord of the Rings (probably because of you) and loves the hero Frodo. Your son thinks Frodo is a fighter, not a rogue, no matter what you say to him. Would you explain to him, "No Son, halfling fighters suck. Their small size means they won't be able to move around anything bigger than a medium sized creature. Plus, you are running around with just a dagger? That is such a waste of your build! You must play with a shield. I mean, everyone knows, a shield and weapon fighter is the only real fighter in this game. Anything else is just a disservice to the group. You don't want to be a disservice to the group, do you, Son?" Most people would not say this to their own son. I know I wouldn't. To do so would just, for all intents and purposes, effectively crush his imagination; we have now imposed artificial walls in his mind. Instead of teaching our son to be creative, we have taught him that there are limitations to that creativity. I feel that we should let him live out his fantasy in the way that he sees it, and thereby stretch the limits of that imagination and creativity. So with this in mind, why would you [I]ever[/I] say this to someone else who is using their free time to come and play D&D with you? If it is wrong to impose artificial walls upon the minds our progeny, surely other people should be afforded the same right. Short version: Greatweapon Fighter is a build in the PHB too. --- As for this fighter build, I think it's great. A viable build for Fighters who have always wanted to dual wield and wear light armor; which it seems there is considerable interest already. Fantastic! And now, maybe those damn light blade/high dex fighter powers will actually see the light of day. (Armor-Piercing Thrust or Rain of Blows for example.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tempest Fighter makes me happy.
Top