Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bromjunaar" data-source="post: 7390918" data-attributes="member: 6946064">I was looking at putting Ranger as I did because I view that as a Fighter who earned his place through being a very skilled fighter. (M being more a focus on skills and learned tricks, application of the brain if you will, P being a kick ass fighter/combatant, application of the body, S being a how natural magic is to them, as I view it)As far as Aristocrats and Experts go, Expert would probably be a better fit for MMM as a general class. Aristocrat could go anywhere on the board depending on the world and campaign, since different cultures give different emphasis to different traits that are desirable in their leadership. That means in some campaigns, the Aristocrat would work better in a PPM slot, a MMP slot, a PMS slot, or even a MMS slot, depending on if the local leadership style is clan chieftain, High King warrior, a High Priest war chief, or a wizened elder who knows some parlor tricks to get people to listen to him. SSS would work for any inate magic or mystic class that is focused around the power within and what is naturally felt, so shaman could fit within this set well enough, though they might branch towards SSP and PMS from how they are taught/learn to work the aether. I will agree though that the names for each archetype might need a touch of work.</blockquote>