Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Desdichado" data-source="post: 1207450" data-attributes="member: 2205">Individual groups can make their own rules, if they so desire.&nbsp; If you're going to invalidate the posts that expand on the &quot;rules&quot;, you invalidate the whole point of the thread, or for there being any such rules to begin with.&nbsp; You're on a slippery slope that ends at there not being any need for internet discussions about D&amp;D at all.I don't agree with correcting mistakes that happen in game either; in fact I'm a firm believer in letting the mistake stand.&nbsp; Recognizing it, however, and not making the mistake again is a completely different consideration.And although no, I don't plan on bringing out of game problems to the game, I don't plan on simply saying &quot;it's against the rules to have out of game problems.&quot;&nbsp; They need to be dealt with, not ignored.And finally, since &quot;I will not be abused&quot; is not an enforceable rule, I think it's completely inconsequential.&nbsp; As someone else said here, it's a bit like saying that you have a personal rule that nothing you own will ever be stolen from you.&nbsp; Whatever.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Desdichado, post: 1207450, member: 2205"] Individual groups can make their own rules, if they so desire. If you're going to invalidate the posts that expand on the "rules", you invalidate the whole point of the thread, or for there being any such rules to begin with. You're on a slippery slope that ends at there not being any need for internet discussions about D&D at all. I don't agree with correcting mistakes that happen in game either; in fact I'm a firm believer in letting the mistake stand. Recognizing it, however, and not making the mistake again is a completely different consideration. And although no, I don't plan on bringing out of game problems to the game, I don't plan on simply saying "it's against the rules to have out of game problems." They need to be dealt with, not ignored. And finally, since "I will not be abused" is not an enforceable rule, I think it's completely inconsequential. As someone else said here, it's a bit like saying that you have a personal rule that nothing you own will ever be stolen from you. Whatever. [/QUOTE]

Verification