Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kai Lord" data-source="post: 988392" data-attributes="member: 3570">Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Terminator 3 - SPOILER filled discussionNot originally.&nbsp; Originally someone other than Reese conceived John with Sarah.&nbsp; This led up to the creation of the TD device with NO Reese in Sarah's past.&nbsp; Of course, once Reese actually went through he then created a loop that would forever erase those original events, even though the new overlapping events arrived at the same destination in the future as the original timeline.Do you understand that Reese OVERLAPPED the original timeline, according to my theory?&nbsp; Overlapped.&nbsp; Meaning that just because he traveled to the past doesn't mean he was ALWAYS in the past, his travel just overlapped the past to make it appear that way.Don't think I'm speaking for James Cameron on this one, he probably wrote it with the notion that you subscribe to; that Reese was always the father and had to go back or John wouldn't be born (as Sarah, mistakenly IMO, says into the tape at the end of T1).&nbsp; But then you've got a paradox, and my way, which the films themselves don't disallow, doesn't create one.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Why should it be consistent with a timeline that was erased?Well, before T3 most people could tell you that John and Sarah prevented the war.&nbsp; T3 shows us they didn't.&nbsp; It also shows us that the war was postponed, a different group designed the prototypes, and so on.&nbsp; I'm glad they didn't dumb down the story and have every little detail the same across overlapping timelines.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kai Lord, post: 988392, member: 3570"] [b]Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Terminator 3 - SPOILER filled discussion[/b] Not originally. Originally someone other than Reese conceived John with Sarah. This led up to the creation of the TD device with NO Reese in Sarah's past. Of course, once Reese actually went through he then created a loop that would forever erase those original events, even though the new overlapping events arrived at the same destination in the future as the original timeline. Do you understand that Reese OVERLAPPED the original timeline, according to my theory? Overlapped. Meaning that just because he traveled to the past doesn't mean he was ALWAYS in the past, his travel just overlapped the past to make it appear that way. Don't think I'm speaking for James Cameron on this one, he probably wrote it with the notion that you subscribe to; that Reese was always the father and had to go back or John wouldn't be born (as Sarah, mistakenly IMO, says into the tape at the end of T1). But then you've got a paradox, and my way, which the films themselves don't disallow, doesn't create one. :) Why should it be consistent with a timeline that was erased? Well, before T3 most people could tell you that John and Sarah prevented the war. T3 shows us they didn't. It also shows us that the war was postponed, a different group designed the prototypes, and so on. I'm glad they didn't dumb down the story and have every little detail the same across overlapping timelines. [/QUOTE]

Verification