Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Black Knight Irios" data-source="post: 5977326" data-attributes="member: 8853">I really like playing a fighter. And playing a fighter is nice except for the fact that the average D&amp;D game ist not only &quot;I'm standing here hitting things&quot;. Fighters had nearly no skillpoints in 3E and could basically just stupidly stand there and hit things and even for doing that they needed a crapton of magical items.Wizards and Clerics had there sheer unlimited spell lists and could engage and contribute in a meaningful way in pretty much any and all activities.And since I know about this problem I'm concerned with it as a DM. OTOH, I enjoy playing a wizard or a cleric as well or a nice gish build. That does not mean that I don't see a problem with the system, it means only that for once I can enjoy it.The reintroduction of Vancian casting in 5E will again (past exp.) put those casters in an advantageous position and I hope therefore, that all other classes get nice compensation.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Black Knight Irios, post: 5977326, member: 8853"] I really like playing a fighter. And playing a fighter is nice except for the fact that the average D&D game ist not only "I'm standing here hitting things". Fighters had nearly no skillpoints in 3E and could basically just stupidly stand there and hit things and even for doing that they needed a crapton of magical items. Wizards and Clerics had there sheer unlimited spell lists and could engage and contribute in a meaningful way in pretty much any and all activities. And since I know about this problem I'm concerned with it as a DM. OTOH, I enjoy playing a wizard or a cleric as well or a nice gish build. That does not mean that I don't see a problem with the system, it means only that for once I can enjoy it. The reintroduction of Vancian casting in 5E will again (past exp.) put those casters in an advantageous position and I hope therefore, that all other classes get nice compensation. [/QUOTE]

Verification