Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Thanks, guys, you've ruined Haste for the rest of us.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="neroden" data-source="post: 678858" data-attributes="member: 6063"><p>While Haste may have been too powerful, it was always a tough question whether to take it or Fireball, so from my point of view it was perfectly balanced at third level. At fourth or even fifth level I'd still take it sometimes. Hopefully if they've turned Haste into "Extra Attack" they've put "Real Haste" in at a higher level.</p><p></p><p>'Extra attack' gives no flavor. 'Extra attack plus increased speed' is better, but still eliminates my favorite (and I believe utterly balanced) use of haste: performing a standard action, a move, and a move-equivalent action. (Move, drink potion, cast. Cast, open door, go though it. Move, cast, move.)</p><p></p><p>I'd be reasonably happy with "Haste grants an extra attack or move-equivalent action", although I don't see what was so broken about being able to cast two spells in one round. (As opposed to high level fighters who can make oodles of attacks per round already.) Spellcasters are still limited by spells per day.</p><p></p><p>Changing Haste to make Quicken Spell more desirable is a *really* dumb change, given that several of the designers already agreed that the metamagic feats were misdesigned (because they impose a double cost). Changing the working part to support the broken part is never a good idea.</p><p></p><p>(Of course, if they made Quicken Spell so it didn't up the spell level at all -- or better yet, so that you also didn't have to pick which spells to quicken in advance -- then it might be a reasonable alternative to Haste; as it is it's better as a 'supplement' to Haste for those who want to cast three spells per round.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="neroden, post: 678858, member: 6063"] While Haste may have been too powerful, it was always a tough question whether to take it or Fireball, so from my point of view it was perfectly balanced at third level. At fourth or even fifth level I'd still take it sometimes. Hopefully if they've turned Haste into "Extra Attack" they've put "Real Haste" in at a higher level. 'Extra attack' gives no flavor. 'Extra attack plus increased speed' is better, but still eliminates my favorite (and I believe utterly balanced) use of haste: performing a standard action, a move, and a move-equivalent action. (Move, drink potion, cast. Cast, open door, go though it. Move, cast, move.) I'd be reasonably happy with "Haste grants an extra attack or move-equivalent action", although I don't see what was so broken about being able to cast two spells in one round. (As opposed to high level fighters who can make oodles of attacks per round already.) Spellcasters are still limited by spells per day. Changing Haste to make Quicken Spell more desirable is a *really* dumb change, given that several of the designers already agreed that the metamagic feats were misdesigned (because they impose a double cost). Changing the working part to support the broken part is never a good idea. (Of course, if they made Quicken Spell so it didn't up the spell level at all -- or better yet, so that you also didn't have to pick which spells to quicken in advance -- then it might be a reasonable alternative to Haste; as it is it's better as a 'supplement' to Haste for those who want to cast three spells per round.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Thanks, guys, you've ruined Haste for the rest of us.
Top