Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Merlion" data-source="post: 693180" data-attributes="member: 10397">Like I said the DR thing very well might should have been an alternate rule. Although I really, really dont think its going to be as big a deal as most here say...I dont think theres going to be that many substances, and I think many many DR creatures will still have "standard" DR...in other words bypassed by an +X magic weapon. Also some of the creatures(fiends for instance) already essentialy have the same thing in the form of the regeneration. as it stands NOW you need a holy weapon to kill a bit fiend via damage. AND one of the catagories(Fey) that is going to have "nonstandard" DR is one that PCs rarely if ever actualy fight. Still yes it is a bit bigger change than they gave us the impression they would be making. I like it personaly. And I dont think it will be as big a deal as many say.  I also agree with the Haste change. thats the way it was in all previous editions of the game, and a 9th level wizard casting 3 spells a round is a tad much. And yes no insult meant but I think many of the people who are really broken up about it are people who play this game as though it was a combat game, not a form of interactive storytelling.  And above all...we still havent seen the full revisions.And, a note to Petrosion should he see this: Yes, that goes for both sides of the arguement. However, those of us who feel the revisions probably will be good DO have a basis for it even tho we havent seen it yet...(or at least I do). When 3e was coming out, many said they hated it before they saw it. I said I loved it. and that proved about 90% true when it came out. and I think many who said they hated it changed there minds tho I have no empirical proof of this. And no the fact that I love 3e doesnt conflict with the fact that I like the revisions because yes it has some glaring problems(the ranger for instance.)</blockquote>

Verification