Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Shard O'Glase" data-source="post: 693453" data-attributes="member: 1134">When 3e was coming out many of us had specific complaints beyond the 3e sucks crowd.&nbsp; I was mostly for 3e but certain rules I thought were a bad idea.&nbsp; Wierdly enough I still think they are a bad idea.&nbsp; I think these situations fall more along the lines of my past 3e experiences than yours.&nbsp; Why?&nbsp; Well because we aren't saying 3.5 suxxxs.&nbsp; We are saying these specific rules I can see having problems with.&nbsp; Especially considering this is a revision and not a huge change like 2e to 3e we have a much better chance at analyzing the possible rules problems, and coming to a somewhat informed opinion.The dR change I can se problems with.(golfbag etc we have enough pages on it)&nbsp; Haste I think most people beleive a change was needed. Many of us though think this change isn't a good one.&nbsp; It will be truning a too good spell into a too weak spell which isn't a good fix IMO.&nbsp; It is amrginally like the 2e one except it doesn't double your attack rate, and it only effect one eprosn istead of one person per level, and it doesn't age you.&nbsp; The 2e version was signifigantly more powerful but it had a lame resticiton that made it a spell that was never cast.(unless you had lots of age cure potions)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shard O'Glase, post: 693453, member: 1134"] When 3e was coming out many of us had specific complaints beyond the 3e sucks crowd. I was mostly for 3e but certain rules I thought were a bad idea. Wierdly enough I still think they are a bad idea. I think these situations fall more along the lines of my past 3e experiences than yours. Why? Well because we aren't saying 3.5 suxxxs. We are saying these specific rules I can see having problems with. Especially considering this is a revision and not a huge change like 2e to 3e we have a much better chance at analyzing the possible rules problems, and coming to a somewhat informed opinion. The dR change I can se problems with.(golfbag etc we have enough pages on it) Haste I think most people beleive a change was needed. Many of us though think this change isn't a good one. It will be truning a too good spell into a too weak spell which isn't a good fix IMO. It is amrginally like the 2e one except it doesn't double your attack rate, and it only effect one eprosn istead of one person per level, and it doesn't age you. The 2e version was signifigantly more powerful but it had a lame resticiton that made it a spell that was never cast.(unless you had lots of age cure potions) [/QUOTE]

Verification