Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
That Penny Arcade Controversy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 6179664" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>I want to reiterate, before anything else, that there's no objective framework in play here - as I noted before, everyone defines a given action differently, and likewise ranks actions on the deontological tiers as they like. Ergo, the best I can provide you with is my personal reasoning; as with all forms of moral beliefs, you may not agree.</p><p></p><p>In regards to the examples you post, I'm presuming that they're operating in regards to an action of a store owner refusing to sell a particular item or material. In which case, we then attempt to devise what specific action is happening here, and where it ranks. (It should be noted that this can sound an awful lot like trying to determine the motivation of the store owner. It's not, however, simply because we don't know what the owner's motivations are - even if he or she tells us, we can't determine their honesty. Hence, we have to make a judgment call in regards to the nature of the action itself.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Presuming that this was intended to be a question, I'm not sure I understand the policy in question. The legal aspect goes without saying, but the part about them selling materials approved for ages 13 and up suggests that they don't sell materials that are specifically designed for children, which tends to be the opposite of how those sorts of bans usually work (e.g. "we don't sell anything that's only approved for people 17 and up").</p><p></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>In each case, the lens through which these scenarios is examined (at least for me) is, "do not suppress someone else's creative expression." As such, all that needs to be answered is if these actions are those, or is another action that simply happens to have the same consequences. Leaving aside that this is my own personal framework, what you think the answers to each of these are? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> </em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Then for his sake I hope that he's very widely-read!</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 6179664, member: 8461"] I want to reiterate, before anything else, that there's no objective framework in play here - as I noted before, everyone defines a given action differently, and likewise ranks actions on the deontological tiers as they like. Ergo, the best I can provide you with is my personal reasoning; as with all forms of moral beliefs, you may not agree. In regards to the examples you post, I'm presuming that they're operating in regards to an action of a store owner refusing to sell a particular item or material. In which case, we then attempt to devise what specific action is happening here, and where it ranks. (It should be noted that this can sound an awful lot like trying to determine the motivation of the store owner. It's not, however, simply because we don't know what the owner's motivations are - even if he or she tells us, we can't determine their honesty. Hence, we have to make a judgment call in regards to the nature of the action itself.) Presuming that this was intended to be a question, I'm not sure I understand the policy in question. The legal aspect goes without saying, but the part about them selling materials approved for ages 13 and up suggests that they don't sell materials that are specifically designed for children, which tends to be the opposite of how those sorts of bans usually work (e.g. "we don't sell anything that's only approved for people 17 and up"). [i] In each case, the lens through which these scenarios is examined (at least for me) is, "do not suppress someone else's creative expression." As such, all that needs to be answered is if these actions are those, or is another action that simply happens to have the same consequences. Leaving aside that this is my own personal framework, what you think the answers to each of these are? ;) Then for his sake I hope that he's very widely-read![/i] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
That Penny Arcade Controversy
Top