Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"that you can see", "line of sight", glass, mirrors, ~clairvoyance, blindsight, and anything else.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 9038195" data-attributes="member: 6787503"><p>Keep in mind that I was engaging with a hypothetical proposition. I.e. “Had they wanted it to work such that...” I certainly don’t think it was the actual intent of the spell targeting rules for a pane of transparent glass to prevent targeting, but someone could run it that way if they chose for their game. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The rules for cover give examples of obstacles that are capable of providing cover: walls, furniture, creatures, tree trunks, etc. They are all fairly substantial solid objects that could potentially block a blow from a weapon or similar force. I’m not sure what value there is in considering “forms of impedance” that could affect spells separately from that since spells aren’t actual measurable phenomena with any known qualities. Such “considerations” are just somebody making something up. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I don’t think I understand the question. If the target can be seen and isn’t behind total cover, then I should think the spell goes off as intended. </p><p></p><p></p><p>My question would be why spells should be privileged above weapons in this way. There already seems to be a perceived power imbalance between spell casting and martial characters, and I think giving casters such an ability would have the effect of widening that gap.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hriston, post: 9038195, member: 6787503"] Keep in mind that I was engaging with a hypothetical proposition. I.e. “Had they wanted it to work such that...” I certainly don’t think it was the actual intent of the spell targeting rules for a pane of transparent glass to prevent targeting, but someone could run it that way if they chose for their game. The rules for cover give examples of obstacles that are capable of providing cover: walls, furniture, creatures, tree trunks, etc. They are all fairly substantial solid objects that could potentially block a blow from a weapon or similar force. I’m not sure what value there is in considering “forms of impedance” that could affect spells separately from that since spells aren’t actual measurable phenomena with any known qualities. Such “considerations” are just somebody making something up. I don’t think I understand the question. If the target can be seen and isn’t behind total cover, then I should think the spell goes off as intended. My question would be why spells should be privileged above weapons in this way. There already seems to be a perceived power imbalance between spell casting and martial characters, and I think giving casters such an ability would have the effect of widening that gap. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"that you can see", "line of sight", glass, mirrors, ~clairvoyance, blindsight, and anything else.
Top