Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="andy3k" data-source="post: 5552045" data-attributes="member: 6674918">I agree with FireLance. Fleche, as defined above, is less effective than either a standard attack while adjacent or a charge when at least 2 squares away. This is not power creep, this is closing a loophole.And why do you say that it's okay for the monsters to get the advantage? Monsters can use fleche, too. The field is even. In fact, I'm more concerned with intelligent and versatile PCs putting monsters into the nasty 1-square bubble than vice versa. All things being equal, for the most part, we're talking about the un-fun-ness (that is certainly NOT a dictionary word <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />) of having a standard action in which I can do nothing equivalent to a standard attack or charge when the only thing preventing it is a 1 square gap. I am participating in the re-defining of stun for the same reason ... un-fun-ness.D&D is supposed to be high fantasy where everyone is heroic. Yes, it is important for combat to be balanced, and I am okay with being punished, but don't take away my ability to play.How many people have played Monopoly and gotten stuck in jail for 3 turns while others circle the board, buying up property. Royally sucks, huh?</blockquote>