Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 9378376" data-attributes="member: 59057">I am still really wondering why some people hate the idea that a 10 year old game gets a little doover...there are already posts that imoly that all it is is a cash grab... of course they wamt to sell new books. Which makes sense for a company. No one is forced to upgrade and buy new book. Especially when the biggest complainers are able to just modify content of older books themselves. I have played 3.5 with the srd and 3.0 books for quite a while with no problems. The only place where you notice some friction is dndbeyond... but that is also something the same people don't like... To the actual topic: in my opinion backwards compatibility seems way higher than in back in 3.5 where quite some player facing rules changed:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">The skill list changed</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">spell levels (and schools) of a lot of spells changed. Some spells were broken into parts.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">weapon sizes were introduced.</li>
</ul></blockquote>

[QUOTE="UngeheuerLich, post: 9378376, member: 59057"] I am still really wondering why some people hate the idea that a 10 year old game gets a little doover... there are already posts that imoly that all it is is a cash grab... of course they wamt to sell new books. Which makes sense for a company. No one is forced to upgrade and buy new book. Especially when the biggest complainers are able to just modify content of older books themselves. I have played 3.5 with the srd and 3.0 books for quite a while with no problems. The only place where you notice some friction is dndbeyond... but that is also something the same people don't like... To the actual topic: in my opinion backwards compatibility seems way higher than in back in 3.5 where quite some player facing rules changed: [LIST] [*]The skill list changed [*]spell levels (and schools) of a lot of spells changed. Some spells were broken into parts. [*]weapon sizes were introduced. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Verification