Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tia Nadiezja" data-source="post: 7727311" data-attributes="member: 6778763">Oh, if you read my posts you'll seeI've been waiting for so longFor another book to readAnd add things to my gameBut 'cause AL's got this silly rule, you see,To make things work out thereThey've got to reprint rules, you seeAnd waste pagespace I'd like to useFor something newFor my playersAt my gameAt my houseFar awaaaaaaaaaaay from them!I'm a terrible poet, but that's been my focus my entire time in this thread. AL's PHB+1 rule means that if WotC wants people in organized play to be able to use an old rule (say, a subclass) with a new rule (say, a feat), they have to reprint the subclass in the supplement the feat's in. We seem to only get one player-focused printed supplement every two years or so; burning space in them on reprints, especially at the price point they're at (that, I'll note, I'll willingly pay because 5e is a really good game, which is part of why I dislike the PHB+1 rule in and of itself), is a significant cost to people's home games.That's why I'm upset by this. AL wants to be restrictionist, okay, I'll not play AL, and while that might bug me I'm not going to come on the forums and gripe about it. AL's restrictions changing how WotC prints books in a way that costs me potential content? Yeah, that'll draw complaints.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tia Nadiezja, post: 7727311, member: 6778763"] Oh, if you read my posts you'll see I've been waiting for so long For another book to read And add things to my game But 'cause AL's got this silly rule, you see, To make things work out there They've got to reprint rules, you see And waste pagespace I'd like to use For something new For my players At my game At my house Far awaaaaaaaaaaay from them! I'm a terrible poet, but that's been my focus my entire time in this thread. AL's PHB+1 rule means that if WotC wants people in organized play to be able to use an old rule (say, a subclass) with a new rule (say, a feat), they have to reprint the subclass in the supplement the feat's in. We seem to only get one player-focused printed supplement every two years or so; burning space in them on reprints, especially at the price point they're at (that, I'll note, I'll willingly pay because 5e is a [I]really good game[/I], which is part of why I dislike the PHB+1 rule in and of itself), is a significant cost to people's home games. That's why I'm upset by this. AL wants to be restrictionist, okay, I'll not play AL, and while that might bug me I'm not going to come on the forums and gripe about it. AL's restrictions changing how WotC prints books in a way that costs me potential content? Yeah, that'll draw complaints. [/QUOTE]

Verification