Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Asisreo" data-source="post: 8065390" data-attributes="member: 7019027">By knowing your DM. If they were considered unreliable, the game would kinda be hurt regardless of the class you choose. With a cooperative DM. I don't feel comfortable at all isolating the DM from the players abilities since it further emphasises the &quot;Us vs them&quot; problem past editions have. I'd be okay if all spellcasters would have to ask permission if the spell they're casting is possible to cast at the time. And how that spell works. Isolating the game from the DM usually causes this counter-fest where the DM didn't know your build was so weak/powerful and now they have to adjust encounters on their end to compensate and so-forth while entwinning the DM in the base uses of the abilities allow the DM to properly balance on the spot without targeting a player or messing with houserules and homebrew or asking you to completely scrap the character because of any power difference.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Asisreo, post: 8065390, member: 7019027"] By knowing your DM. If they were considered unreliable, the game would kinda be hurt regardless of the class you choose. With a cooperative DM. I don't feel comfortable at all isolating the DM from the players abilities since it further emphasises the "Us vs them" problem past editions have. I'd be okay if all spellcasters would have to ask permission if the spell they're casting is possible to cast at the time. And how that spell works. Isolating the game from the DM usually causes this counter-fest where the DM didn't know your build was so weak/powerful and now they have to adjust encounters on their end to compensate and so-forth while entwinning the DM in the base uses of the abilities allow the DM to properly balance on the spot without targeting a player or messing with houserules and homebrew or asking you to completely scrap the character because of any power difference. [/QUOTE]

Verification