Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 8067431" data-attributes="member: 6987520">I agree, but here is a thought:How are other classes any better at exploration or social?Sure, some few have class features, but most are a handful of subclass features, really, if any at all. You might claim that magic is the key for casters, but IME a lot of casters don't have many spells really for social or exploration, because they also focus on combat (spells).I see it more of an issue that other classes can be pretty much as good at fighting as fighters, not that fighters need to be as good at exploration and social as classes designed to be superior in those pillars.It reminds me of the Noble class in d20 SW. They excelled at other things, and maxed out their BAB at +15, while the Soldier maxed out at +20, so was superior in combat.In 5E, each class maxes out "attack" bonus at +11, and with scaling cantrips, sneak attacks, smites, etc. many classes can pretty closely match a fighter in DRP (or outright beat it) and be even more effective in combat.</blockquote>