Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 9372106" data-attributes="member: 4937">Oh?That's not a contradictory statement.  I'm not going to reveal proprietary information about my company either.  My unwillingness to do so is not a confession of wrongdoing.And also, that statement doesn't mean what you seem to think it does.  I agree that if copyright law in the USA applies to large language model creation then they wouldn't be able to exist, but also note that that is a conditional statement.  The second part depends on truth of the first part.   The point is, copyright law doesn't apply to what they did, and I suspect any cases brought against them will be resolved in their favor because the judges will agree.  And so far, that's what all the judges have found.  For example, OpenAI successfully defended itself from writers like Sarah Silverman who argued that she should have been financially compensated for OpenAI processing her memoir as input to their model.  You see the truth is that OpenAI is not admitting or claiming it was engaged in any wrongdoing, quite to the contrary of the innuendo of your statements.</blockquote>