Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Art Waring" data-source="post: 9376000" data-attributes="member: 7037141">Absolutely 100% Agree.I won't pretend to have concrete solutions, as this is a new problem (detecting gen-ai outputs), and these things take time to solve. For example Glaze &amp; Nightshade are currently available to the public, but are still stuck in the early &quot;beta&quot; stages as it will take time to develop the tools to protect artists.Gen-AI developers like OpenAi (having likely broken copyright laws) have a significant headstart, and it will take time to catch up (both the law and security policies need time to address these issues).In the meantime transparency is key. Detectors will likely eventually improve, but ATM they are new and they are not a priority for ai companies (as they don't care about detection, they care about profit). The confusion &amp; chaos benefits them (and increases their profits), so why would they create reliable detection tools that expose the lie that is gen-ai?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Art Waring, post: 9376000, member: 7037141"] Absolutely 100% Agree. I won't pretend to have concrete solutions, as this is a new problem (detecting gen-ai outputs), and these things take time to solve. For example Glaze & Nightshade are currently available to the public, but are still stuck in the early "beta" stages as it will take time to develop the tools to protect artists. Gen-AI developers like OpenAi (having likely broken copyright laws) have a significant headstart, and it will take time to catch up (both the law and security policies need time to address these issues). In the meantime transparency is key. Detectors will likely eventually improve, but ATM they are new and they are not a priority for ai companies (as they don't care about detection, they care about profit). The confusion & chaos benefits them (and increases their profits), so why would they create reliable detection tools that expose the lie that is gen-ai? [/QUOTE]

Verification