Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Angry GM on D&D Encounters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tyranthraxus" data-source="post: 6715836" data-attributes="member: 13335"><p>Ive finally had a chance to read the original blog post.</p><p></p><p>I think he does have soem valid points in amongst the hyperbole.</p><p></p><p>Ive always felt that the Modules (the hardcovers) dont really fit with AL. They are obviously not written for AL and while many people can make it work for them in AL, quite a few dms might get confused and avoid it. </p><p></p><p>As noted we often get the 'the AL Admins dont have anything to do with the Modules so can only provide limited guidance'. Which is a problem there to be honest, as the players and dms are being asked to play and run these modules which were essentially shoehorned into AL and the AL Admin not given sufficient time to able to overview these before they are rushed into action. Now Im not saying here that the AL Admins are consulted when the writers are creating the module from the base, obviously that wouldnt work. What Im saying is explained below. </p><p></p><p>A Much better method, would actually be a 2 month 'gap' period. Over this time the Admins comb the core module, point out areas which will need a 'look' at , perhaps form a team that goes over specific chapters. If the module uses a milestone method and AL obviously does not , a document would be created which exactly and definitively comes from the top (at the moment we have multiple people giving similar views on where a module should be cut up to award dowtime, renown and so on. All very valid documents but nothing really 'official'. And that at the end of the day should be what is needed. An Official document so there is no ... leeway or variation here)</p><p></p><p>A Good example might be Hazirawn an oft talked about Sword from an earlier module which was Intelligent. The conversion document might say 'Replace Hazirawn with a +2 Greatsword' . Thats just one example but it removes the whole issue of the item which has AL rules implications with an item that really does not. It creates no ambiguity, but clearly defines the end result</p><p></p><p>THis is why I think 2 months from when All stores receive it (not from when the special premier stores do) would be best. You release the pdf 2 months (or a month but no less than that). As it is, the Module is feeling rushed into service.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tyranthraxus, post: 6715836, member: 13335"] Ive finally had a chance to read the original blog post. I think he does have soem valid points in amongst the hyperbole. Ive always felt that the Modules (the hardcovers) dont really fit with AL. They are obviously not written for AL and while many people can make it work for them in AL, quite a few dms might get confused and avoid it. As noted we often get the 'the AL Admins dont have anything to do with the Modules so can only provide limited guidance'. Which is a problem there to be honest, as the players and dms are being asked to play and run these modules which were essentially shoehorned into AL and the AL Admin not given sufficient time to able to overview these before they are rushed into action. Now Im not saying here that the AL Admins are consulted when the writers are creating the module from the base, obviously that wouldnt work. What Im saying is explained below. A Much better method, would actually be a 2 month 'gap' period. Over this time the Admins comb the core module, point out areas which will need a 'look' at , perhaps form a team that goes over specific chapters. If the module uses a milestone method and AL obviously does not , a document would be created which exactly and definitively comes from the top (at the moment we have multiple people giving similar views on where a module should be cut up to award dowtime, renown and so on. All very valid documents but nothing really 'official'. And that at the end of the day should be what is needed. An Official document so there is no ... leeway or variation here) A Good example might be Hazirawn an oft talked about Sword from an earlier module which was Intelligent. The conversion document might say 'Replace Hazirawn with a +2 Greatsword' . Thats just one example but it removes the whole issue of the item which has AL rules implications with an item that really does not. It creates no ambiguity, but clearly defines the end result THis is why I think 2 months from when All stores receive it (not from when the special premier stores do) would be best. You release the pdf 2 months (or a month but no less than that). As it is, the Module is feeling rushed into service. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Angry GM on D&D Encounters
Top