Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="koga305" data-source="post: 6718880" data-attributes="member: 6747640">Yup. Those things actually make a lot of sense, and I suppose I was being kind of harsh when I was asking for an official statement. The main point was that Voltramax's post seemed to suggest some things about AL that didn't seem like they were true (specifically, that you didn't want him to engage with Mad Adventurers) and let the guy go over that), and it's nice to get some official confirmation that they're not. Though I agree with Angry's point that some aspects of the AL could be done better, I think the folks in charge do a very good job of running the program And there we go! That seems like the right response to the Voltramax article.I'd still love to see an official AL piece responding to Angry's article, though. He is a reasonable guy and I think his goal with the rant was to foster some discussion about how things could be improved - and maybe catch the attention of the folks at WotC who might be able to make decisions about better supporting the Encounters program.For those of you that didn't catch the Twitter exchange, Angry and the AL Twitter account had a great discussion about his article and the views on the Adventurers League. In particular, the AL account mentioned that &quot;you can expect some big changes next season&quot; - exciting!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="koga305, post: 6718880, member: 6747640"] Yup. Those things actually make a lot of sense, and I suppose I was being kind of harsh when I was asking for an official statement. The main point was that Voltramax's post seemed to suggest some things about AL that didn't seem like they were true (specifically, that you didn't want him to engage with Mad Adventurers) and let the guy go over that), and it's nice to get some official confirmation that they're not. Though I agree with Angry's point that some aspects of the AL could be done better, I think the folks in charge do a very good job of running the program And there we go! That seems like the right response to the Voltramax article. I'd still [I]love[/I] to see an official AL piece responding to Angry's article, though. He is a reasonable guy and I think his goal with the rant was to foster some discussion about how things could be improved - and maybe catch the attention of the folks at WotC who might be able to make decisions about better supporting the Encounters program. For those of you that didn't catch the Twitter exchange, Angry and the AL Twitter account had a great discussion about his article and the views on the Adventurers League. In particular, the AL account mentioned that "you can expect some big changes next season" - exciting! [/QUOTE]

Verification