Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Angry GM on D&D Encounters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve_MND" data-source="post: 6722610" data-attributes="member: 6801314"><p>I think ultimately the real problems lie almost squarely and completely in the way the AL is set up. Namely, that everything that is of critical import to running an Organized Play campaign is <em>not </em> being handled by the people with boots on the ground.</p><p></p><p>The AL Coordinators have remarked before that they cannot make changes to the governing documents -- best they can do is ask WotC to make the change, and hope it shows up in the next version. They cannot provide official errata or rulings to be used in the campaign. Again, best they can hope for is to make the request and hope they see it happen down the line.</p><p></p><p>Which again, ties into the whole ongoing theme some of us have been commenting on, in that WotC/Hasbro seems to want to hand-off stuff to other people to handle, but not give them the tools to do the job properly. They want an AL out there to drum up support for the game and the brand, but they don't want to pay people to handle it in-house. So they hand it over to a bunch of volunteers to handle. However, at the same time, WotC has an important brand to handle, and so don't want any <em>actual </em>changes to be able to be made by the volunteer staff (since it might unknowingly contradict or interfere with a movie deal, or an upcoming Neverwinter MMO patch, or a new paperback coming out), so they keep the people they are entrusting to run the campaign out of the actual loop when it comes to <em>implementing </em>those needed changes.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure, but I strongly suspect most of the volunteers at the administrative level of AL are just as exasperated as we are at the oddly-disparate division of labor/authority in the Campaign, but of course can't express it openly to the general public, because, well, that's not how you handle things in a professional environment.</p><p></p><p>And while I appreciate Skerrit's comments regarding upcoming major changes to the AL, I am cynical enough about stuff like this to actually believe in any sort of substantial change. I will of course be pleasantly surprised if any real changes manifest (as I was when 3-1 was singularly made playable outside the auspices of a game store), but I am in no way actually expecting it, as they claim.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve_MND, post: 6722610, member: 6801314"] I think ultimately the real problems lie almost squarely and completely in the way the AL is set up. Namely, that everything that is of critical import to running an Organized Play campaign is [I]not [/I] being handled by the people with boots on the ground. The AL Coordinators have remarked before that they cannot make changes to the governing documents -- best they can do is ask WotC to make the change, and hope it shows up in the next version. They cannot provide official errata or rulings to be used in the campaign. Again, best they can hope for is to make the request and hope they see it happen down the line. Which again, ties into the whole ongoing theme some of us have been commenting on, in that WotC/Hasbro seems to want to hand-off stuff to other people to handle, but not give them the tools to do the job properly. They want an AL out there to drum up support for the game and the brand, but they don't want to pay people to handle it in-house. So they hand it over to a bunch of volunteers to handle. However, at the same time, WotC has an important brand to handle, and so don't want any [I]actual [/I]changes to be able to be made by the volunteer staff (since it might unknowingly contradict or interfere with a movie deal, or an upcoming Neverwinter MMO patch, or a new paperback coming out), so they keep the people they are entrusting to run the campaign out of the actual loop when it comes to [I]implementing [/I]those needed changes. I'm not sure, but I strongly suspect most of the volunteers at the administrative level of AL are just as exasperated as we are at the oddly-disparate division of labor/authority in the Campaign, but of course can't express it openly to the general public, because, well, that's not how you handle things in a professional environment. And while I appreciate Skerrit's comments regarding upcoming major changes to the AL, I am cynical enough about stuff like this to actually believe in any sort of substantial change. I will of course be pleasantly surprised if any real changes manifest (as I was when 3-1 was singularly made playable outside the auspices of a game store), but I am in no way actually expecting it, as they claim. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Angry GM on D&D Encounters
Top