Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Art and the Artist: Discussing Problematic Issues in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 8527665"><p>Fundamentally Hawkeye, what I am saying is: there is a phrase in the hobby, and that phrase is "This thing causes harm", This is usually followed by some kind of call to action about the thing. I am a let less concerned about lose uses of harm, hurt, etc. And more concerned about this particular use, because it doesn't seem to get a lot of examination when it is used, but it also appears to hold a lot of rhetorical power. I think that is worth commenting on . It isn't the end of the discussion, but it means we should drill down when someone says "This causes harm" and ask what they mean, whether harm is the best term to describe what they are talking about, etc. And this is a phrase I hear and see used all the time, and it very consistently quiets people (so I do think discussing is helpful: but I agree we don't need any more discussion of it than we've had here, it is something of a side point). </p><p></p><p>I do get there can be problems. But there can also be hysteria around these kinds of issues, and I think people have a tendency to rush towards poorly thought out solutions. I don't think for example, that an old product with content that could be labeled problematic, that is clearly a product of its time, is much of a barrier to the hobby in a real sense anymore. And I think intelligent people can look at these historical products and deduce this for themselves without WOTC telling them what to think of it. Now telling people they aren't welcome, that absolutely hurts the hobby and excludes people. Having racist art certainly would discourage people. But a lot of what we are talking about is much more gray: evil orcs, tropes about barbarians versus people form cities, anachronistic or inaccurate adoption of cultural aesthetics (not mean, mocking, or racist, just anachronistic and inaccurate), plundering a dungeon, etc. And like I have been saying, if you go and talk to people who you are expressing concern about, you get very different opinions on these things. It isn't as cut and dry as I think a lot of these discussions would make it seem.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 85555, post: 8527665"] Fundamentally Hawkeye, what I am saying is: there is a phrase in the hobby, and that phrase is "This thing causes harm", This is usually followed by some kind of call to action about the thing. I am a let less concerned about lose uses of harm, hurt, etc. And more concerned about this particular use, because it doesn't seem to get a lot of examination when it is used, but it also appears to hold a lot of rhetorical power. I think that is worth commenting on . It isn't the end of the discussion, but it means we should drill down when someone says "This causes harm" and ask what they mean, whether harm is the best term to describe what they are talking about, etc. And this is a phrase I hear and see used all the time, and it very consistently quiets people (so I do think discussing is helpful: but I agree we don't need any more discussion of it than we've had here, it is something of a side point). I do get there can be problems. But there can also be hysteria around these kinds of issues, and I think people have a tendency to rush towards poorly thought out solutions. I don't think for example, that an old product with content that could be labeled problematic, that is clearly a product of its time, is much of a barrier to the hobby in a real sense anymore. And I think intelligent people can look at these historical products and deduce this for themselves without WOTC telling them what to think of it. Now telling people they aren't welcome, that absolutely hurts the hobby and excludes people. Having racist art certainly would discourage people. But a lot of what we are talking about is much more gray: evil orcs, tropes about barbarians versus people form cities, anachronistic or inaccurate adoption of cultural aesthetics (not mean, mocking, or racist, just anachronistic and inaccurate), plundering a dungeon, etc. And like I have been saying, if you go and talk to people who you are expressing concern about, you get very different opinions on these things. It isn't as cut and dry as I think a lot of these discussions would make it seem. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Art and the Artist: Discussing Problematic Issues in D&D
Top