Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The Athar in 4e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5753104" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>Thanks for the praise. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>From this perspective, the Athar and the Godsmen would certianly be kindred spirits in believing that mortals have something special in them (though they'd also be kindred spirits to, say, the Sign of One in that regard. A Signer would be eager to agree that the gods are just an illusion!). The Athar take this in an outward-directed path, looking at the people around them, and the gods that control them, and seeking to educate and liberate. </p><p></p><p>The Godsmen, on the other hand, take this in an inward-directed path, looking at how to more properly develop their own inner spark over the course of multiple lifetimes. Any broader education is kind of incidental: the idea is that we all must walk our own path to our own idea of perfect, so it's not like you can teach a guttersnipe to be a prince.</p><p></p><p>From the Athar's perspective, the Godsmen are self-centered. I like the line "becoming part of the grand facade," and I think that captures it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Godsmen are greedy and selfish, in the Athar estimation, wanting to achieve power without sharing it. The Godsmen think we all have to work hard and perfect ourselves to become gods, but that's just not true, say the Athar: we all would be as gods already, if not for the hoarding of divine power by the deities. </p><p></p><p>The Godsmen, like a lot of folks, think the Athar are way too focused on the impossible. The Godsmen also respect the deities as fully-formed individuals who have gone through the reincarnation process and perfected themselves already. They are examples to emulate, not overlords. They have every right to be our leaders, since they are the closest thing the multiverse has to a perfect entity. In the Athar's analogy of the gods as gold-hoarding dragons, the Godsmen say, well, if you want gold, you should probably learn how to get it from that dragon that's sitting on a pile of it. Clearly, that dragon knows something you don't. </p><p></p><p>I think it's a difference that'll come across well when I hit up the Believers themselves. Both factions would agree in broad terms that mortal beings are capable of great things without the gods. The Godsmen would just believe that the gods are entities to emulate, while the Athar would believe that the gods are entities to throw down. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>DERP. Yes. Changed! Thanks!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I figured, if discorporating was the gods' "I'm not dead yet!", the Inescapable trait was the Godslayer's "Oh, no, really, you ARE." <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>I'm a fan of how risky <em>Seal Divinity</em> is, too. It's a reaction, and the Godslayer probably wants to use it on the big solo in the battle, but first the god needs to hit them. Really tempts the Athar character to walk right up to Zeus and bop him on the nose, to provoke a god into trying -- DARING -- to strike them down. Sort of "You get one shot. Better make it a good one." If the Athar survives, the god is shut down significantly. If the Athar doesn't survive...well, I guess the deity showed him who's boss? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 5753104, member: 2067"] Thanks for the praise. :) From this perspective, the Athar and the Godsmen would certianly be kindred spirits in believing that mortals have something special in them (though they'd also be kindred spirits to, say, the Sign of One in that regard. A Signer would be eager to agree that the gods are just an illusion!). The Athar take this in an outward-directed path, looking at the people around them, and the gods that control them, and seeking to educate and liberate. The Godsmen, on the other hand, take this in an inward-directed path, looking at how to more properly develop their own inner spark over the course of multiple lifetimes. Any broader education is kind of incidental: the idea is that we all must walk our own path to our own idea of perfect, so it's not like you can teach a guttersnipe to be a prince. From the Athar's perspective, the Godsmen are self-centered. I like the line "becoming part of the grand facade," and I think that captures it. :) Godsmen are greedy and selfish, in the Athar estimation, wanting to achieve power without sharing it. The Godsmen think we all have to work hard and perfect ourselves to become gods, but that's just not true, say the Athar: we all would be as gods already, if not for the hoarding of divine power by the deities. The Godsmen, like a lot of folks, think the Athar are way too focused on the impossible. The Godsmen also respect the deities as fully-formed individuals who have gone through the reincarnation process and perfected themselves already. They are examples to emulate, not overlords. They have every right to be our leaders, since they are the closest thing the multiverse has to a perfect entity. In the Athar's analogy of the gods as gold-hoarding dragons, the Godsmen say, well, if you want gold, you should probably learn how to get it from that dragon that's sitting on a pile of it. Clearly, that dragon knows something you don't. I think it's a difference that'll come across well when I hit up the Believers themselves. Both factions would agree in broad terms that mortal beings are capable of great things without the gods. The Godsmen would just believe that the gods are entities to emulate, while the Athar would believe that the gods are entities to throw down. DERP. Yes. Changed! Thanks! I figured, if discorporating was the gods' "I'm not dead yet!", the Inescapable trait was the Godslayer's "Oh, no, really, you ARE." :) I'm a fan of how risky [I]Seal Divinity[/I] is, too. It's a reaction, and the Godslayer probably wants to use it on the big solo in the battle, but first the god needs to hit them. Really tempts the Athar character to walk right up to Zeus and bop him on the nose, to provoke a god into trying -- DARING -- to strike them down. Sort of "You get one shot. Better make it a good one." If the Athar survives, the god is shut down significantly. If the Athar doesn't survive...well, I guess the deity showed him who's boss? :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The Athar in 4e
Top