Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Battle of 5 Armies (er...editions)!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wingsandsword" data-source="post: 4095077" data-attributes="member: 14159"><p>For many of us, we've seen enough to know that we don't like it. Even though we haven't eseen it all, we dislike more of what we've seen of 4e than we dislike of whatever edition we prefer more.</p><p></p><p>After all, Wizards has been trying to show us what is best about 4e, they are trying to sell us on it, to show us what is new and different. When some of us read that advertising and realize it actually makes us less wanting to play the game than before we read it, that's a bad sign about us actually liking the game. When the advertising for a product makes you desire that product less than before, that's bad.</p><p></p><p>I'm sticking with 3.5, and I have plenty of reasons.</p><p></p><p>1. It has enough of the classical feel elements of previous editions of D&D to have that critical D&D feel, elements that 4e has already gleefully chucked out and said weren't good to begin with. Sacred cows were sacred to some of us for a reason.</p><p></p><p>2. I already know 3.5 and don't have to re-learn a whole new game. I don't really see the point in learning yet another RPG when I am quite happy with the existing ones.</p><p></p><p>3. I already have dozens of 3.5 books, and I realized a couple of years ago I have enough books to game for decades. In the last year I've bought only 5 D&D books, ones that I really wanted or got really good deals on. Paying $120 for the 2008 model year D&D core books, then a DDI subscription every months, then another ~$120 for the next years D&D core books and so on until 5e comes out has no appeal to me whatsoever.</p><p></p><p>4. The people I game with are also unenthused about 4e and have either felt offended by the 4e marketing saying that 3e was wrongbadfun, or don't like the idea that WotC now openly considers D&D a game that <i>must</i> have a new edition every few years so they figure there is no reason to buy 4e when 5e will come out in a few more years, or they just plain don't like what they've seen from the previews. When the people I game with don't want to play 4e, then I've got no reason to switch over myself.</p><p></p><p>5. I am much more of a simulationist and narritivist in terms of my D&D tastes. The openly gamist structure of 4e over those play styles means that the underlying philosophy the game is designed on will conflict with what I want from a D&D edition. 3.5 may have been a little more gamist than other editions, but when balanced against some of it's strengths it still came out superior to me.</p><p></p><p>Essentially, there are those of us out there who are not sold on the underlying concept that a new edition was needed, and haven't seen anything </p><p></p><p>3.5 might not be perfect: I don't like pokemounts, and I really don't like darkness spells that light up pitch-black rooms, but it's closer to my idea of perfection than any other edition.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wingsandsword, post: 4095077, member: 14159"] For many of us, we've seen enough to know that we don't like it. Even though we haven't eseen it all, we dislike more of what we've seen of 4e than we dislike of whatever edition we prefer more. After all, Wizards has been trying to show us what is best about 4e, they are trying to sell us on it, to show us what is new and different. When some of us read that advertising and realize it actually makes us less wanting to play the game than before we read it, that's a bad sign about us actually liking the game. When the advertising for a product makes you desire that product less than before, that's bad. I'm sticking with 3.5, and I have plenty of reasons. 1. It has enough of the classical feel elements of previous editions of D&D to have that critical D&D feel, elements that 4e has already gleefully chucked out and said weren't good to begin with. Sacred cows were sacred to some of us for a reason. 2. I already know 3.5 and don't have to re-learn a whole new game. I don't really see the point in learning yet another RPG when I am quite happy with the existing ones. 3. I already have dozens of 3.5 books, and I realized a couple of years ago I have enough books to game for decades. In the last year I've bought only 5 D&D books, ones that I really wanted or got really good deals on. Paying $120 for the 2008 model year D&D core books, then a DDI subscription every months, then another ~$120 for the next years D&D core books and so on until 5e comes out has no appeal to me whatsoever. 4. The people I game with are also unenthused about 4e and have either felt offended by the 4e marketing saying that 3e was wrongbadfun, or don't like the idea that WotC now openly considers D&D a game that <i>must</i> have a new edition every few years so they figure there is no reason to buy 4e when 5e will come out in a few more years, or they just plain don't like what they've seen from the previews. When the people I game with don't want to play 4e, then I've got no reason to switch over myself. 5. I am much more of a simulationist and narritivist in terms of my D&D tastes. The openly gamist structure of 4e over those play styles means that the underlying philosophy the game is designed on will conflict with what I want from a D&D edition. 3.5 may have been a little more gamist than other editions, but when balanced against some of it's strengths it still came out superior to me. Essentially, there are those of us out there who are not sold on the underlying concept that a new edition was needed, and haven't seen anything 3.5 might not be perfect: I don't like pokemounts, and I really don't like darkness spells that light up pitch-black rooms, but it's closer to my idea of perfection than any other edition. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Battle of 5 Armies (er...editions)!
Top