Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="IronWolf" data-source="post: 5574202" data-attributes="member: 21076">Er, okay?I've read the whole thread.&nbsp; I have seen lots of unbacked mentions of how unsuccessful previous sets were and I've seen you drop the phrase &quot;pay-to-preview&quot; as many times as one can in a post.&nbsp; You did break out why the &quot;pay-to-preview&quot; model is doomed to fail to which I replied on each point.There was this I suppose...But then that was followed immediately by this:Paizo is including two more levels than the original basic sets and has a path forward should you want to do so - just like there used to be when the expert set came out or a person could choose to turn then into the land of AD&amp;D.&nbsp; They really seem geared on recreating the feel of these original sets than anything in recent years.&nbsp; I don't see the need to make a divergent product line to be successful with this.In either case - I suspect you and I are just going to have to agree to disagree on much of this.&nbsp; Besides in the end both of us appear to want Paizo to be successful with this.&nbsp; I just have more optimism that they can than you though it does not appear either of us wants them to fail.&nbsp; I am good with that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="IronWolf, post: 5574202, member: 21076"] Er, okay? I've read the whole thread. I have seen lots of unbacked mentions of how unsuccessful previous sets were and I've seen you drop the phrase "pay-to-preview" as many times as one can in a post. You did break out why the "pay-to-preview" model is doomed to fail to which I replied on each point. There was this I suppose... But then that was followed immediately by this: Paizo is including two more levels than the original basic sets and has a path forward should you want to do so - just like there used to be when the expert set came out or a person could choose to turn then into the land of AD&D. They really seem geared on recreating the feel of these original sets than anything in recent years. I don't see the need to make a divergent product line to be successful with this. In either case - I suspect you and I are just going to have to agree to disagree on much of this. Besides in the end both of us appear to want Paizo to be successful with this. I just have more optimism that they can than you though it does not appear either of us wants them to fail. I am good with that. [/QUOTE]

Verification