Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4517529" data-attributes="member: 710">3e and 3.5 are mostly different in the fine print - this can make a difference for classes, but not really for modules. You could try a conversion, but it's probably easier if you don't, and won't harm the game.I think most D&D modules are pretty combat heavy, but I know mostly Paizo/Dungeon and WotC adventures. But that doesn't mean there isn't a lot to explore and a lot of NPCs to interact with. I think it's often a question on how much time you invest in this. Still, expect a lot of combats in each adventure - most of the XP gained in any module will come from combat encounters, I think. The Dungeon adventure paths Shackled City(also available as hardcover), Age of Worms and Savage Tides are generally seen as of high quality (but even they are not without faults, but considering the cover levels 1-20, some flaws are to be expected). I also enjoyed Malhavoc Press Banewarren as a player.The Pathfinder adventure Path from Paizo are also widely regarded as well done (no suprise, they also created the aforementioned adventure path).Note that the DMs in my group are converting adventure paths like Savage Tides, Rise of the Runelords and Curse of the Crimson Throne to D&D 4E because we got a little tired of 3E (and they find this easier then DMing the adventure as is with 3.5 rules).</blockquote>