Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
The Best Thing from 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Crimson Binome" data-source="post: 6589739" data-attributes="member: 6775031"><p>I think you have a pretty thorough understanding of my style, by now. Players are players and the GM is the GM. The players each play the role of one character. The GM plays all of the NPCs, and designs the world which the PCs explore. It is not the place of the players to author any of the backstory of the world, aside from the backgrounds of their own characters, which must be negotiated with the GM to make sure they fit into the world.</p><p></p><p>It is similar to a sandbox-style video game, which is entirely created by (often professional) game developers in some dark office building. The roles of player and developer are extremely well-segregated. The major difference between a video game and a TTRPG is that the AI for the game is replaced with the actual intelligence of the GM, who can try to account for any possibilities that the players might come up with.</p><p></p><p>If players get in and start tinkering with the code of a game, it loses a lot of the authenticity. You didn't play Fallout 2, but you played your own hacked version of Fallout 2. You didn't play through Your Friend Jim's Campaign Against the Iron Giants, because you played in your own hacked version of that campaign.</p><p></p><p>That seems weird to me. If your campaign setting has a history of being plagued by undead and demons, and not so much by giants or dragons, then it would make internal sense if that setting had more demon-slayers and undead-hunters than dragon-slayers and giant-killers.</p><p></p><p>They know that the right path is their ultimate goal of why they broke into this place, but they don't know what's down the left path. It could be a dragon, or it could be a dead end.</p><p></p><p>Just as it is good role-playing for a player to imagine herself in the place of her character, and make decisions from that standpoint, so it is my place as DM to imagine what the Big Bad would do. If you have a lot of minions, then you're going to need an office to keep that stuff organized. It would be weird if that information didn't exist somewhere.</p><p></p><p>I don't know who wrote that module. As a general rule, I don't run modules and I don't like to play in them. I'm just saying, you seem to play in one style, and this official product seems to go against your style. If your style was common, or if the designers of that module had agreed with your style, then it wouldn't have been designed in this way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Crimson Binome, post: 6589739, member: 6775031"] I think you have a pretty thorough understanding of my style, by now. Players are players and the GM is the GM. The players each play the role of one character. The GM plays all of the NPCs, and designs the world which the PCs explore. It is not the place of the players to author any of the backstory of the world, aside from the backgrounds of their own characters, which must be negotiated with the GM to make sure they fit into the world. It is similar to a sandbox-style video game, which is entirely created by (often professional) game developers in some dark office building. The roles of player and developer are extremely well-segregated. The major difference between a video game and a TTRPG is that the AI for the game is replaced with the actual intelligence of the GM, who can try to account for any possibilities that the players might come up with. If players get in and start tinkering with the code of a game, it loses a lot of the authenticity. You didn't play Fallout 2, but you played your own hacked version of Fallout 2. You didn't play through Your Friend Jim's Campaign Against the Iron Giants, because you played in your own hacked version of that campaign. That seems weird to me. If your campaign setting has a history of being plagued by undead and demons, and not so much by giants or dragons, then it would make internal sense if that setting had more demon-slayers and undead-hunters than dragon-slayers and giant-killers. They know that the right path is their ultimate goal of why they broke into this place, but they don't know what's down the left path. It could be a dragon, or it could be a dead end. Just as it is good role-playing for a player to imagine herself in the place of her character, and make decisions from that standpoint, so it is my place as DM to imagine what the Big Bad would do. If you have a lot of minions, then you're going to need an office to keep that stuff organized. It would be weird if that information didn't exist somewhere. I don't know who wrote that module. As a general rule, I don't run modules and I don't like to play in them. I'm just saying, you seem to play in one style, and this official product seems to go against your style. If your style was common, or if the designers of that module had agreed with your style, then it wouldn't have been designed in this way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
The Best Thing from 4E
Top