Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The Best Thing from 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6591453" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>So is the hypothetical you are inviting us to consider this one?</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">1. The GM tells the players they come to a left/right "fork". The players choose one or the other. Whichever they choose, the GM tells them that their PCs come upon the cultists about to sacrifice the prisoners.</p><p></p><p>Or is it this one?</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">2. The GM tells the players they come to a left/right "fork". If the players choose the right, their PCs will come upon the cultists about to sacrifice the prisoners. If they choose the left, their PCs will come upon something else (let's say, the office/library); and if, following that, the PCs then go down the right path, they will come upon the cultists about to sacrifice the prisoners.</p><p></p><p>My view of (1) is that the whole thing looks like poor GMing (with a possible exception - see below). Why is the GM writing in a choice of paths, if in fact the fiction is going to be constant? Maybe there is a story to tell about the choice adding colour? I don't think I've ever heard of anyone doing (1) in D&D, which tends to be somewhat map-oriented.</p><p></p><p>The exception I can think of is if the GM is anticipating a chase/flight scene - and so expects the players to be keeping track of their choices so that their PCs can retrace their steps without getting lost.</p><p></p><p>(2), on the other hand, is completely standard for a wide range of play approaches. Classic D&D dungeons used to have "freeze frame" rooms - when the PCs arrive at the room the nymph is playing on her flute, or the dragon is asleep on its ledge, or the cultists are in the process of sacrificing the prisoners, or whatever. In the typical classic "freeze frame", the PCs have no causal connection to the events until they get there, though their may be an emotional connection (and likewise by the players): eg in another room the PCs may have acquired rumours of the prisoners, or learned that there is a musical nymph or a dragon in the dungeon.</p><p></p><p>Adventure paths have "freeze frame" rooms or situations. In I6 Pharoah, for instance (somewhere on the border between a classic dungeon and an AP), the dervishes will be looking for their missing members <em>whenever</em> the PCs arrive at the pyramid. I assume that Dragonlance, and the modern APs, are full of this sort of thing.</p><p></p><p>I'm not running classic dungeoneering, nor APs, but would use a set-up like (2). For the reasons I've set out at length upthread, mostly in conversation with [MENTION=6775031]Saelorn[/MENTION], I think it would completely deprotagonise the players, who are searching for the prisoners, to have the prisoners killed off-screen. And if I wanted to make <em>time</em> a factor, there are plenty of ways of incorporating that (eg via skill challenge) which would mean that the deaths didn't happen in a way disconnected from the players' knowing participation in the process of action resolution.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6591453, member: 42582"] So is the hypothetical you are inviting us to consider this one? [indent]1. The GM tells the players they come to a left/right "fork". The players choose one or the other. Whichever they choose, the GM tells them that their PCs come upon the cultists about to sacrifice the prisoners.[/indent] Or is it this one? [indent]2. The GM tells the players they come to a left/right "fork". If the players choose the right, their PCs will come upon the cultists about to sacrifice the prisoners. If they choose the left, their PCs will come upon something else (let's say, the office/library); and if, following that, the PCs then go down the right path, they will come upon the cultists about to sacrifice the prisoners.[/indent] My view of (1) is that the whole thing looks like poor GMing (with a possible exception - see below). Why is the GM writing in a choice of paths, if in fact the fiction is going to be constant? Maybe there is a story to tell about the choice adding colour? I don't think I've ever heard of anyone doing (1) in D&D, which tends to be somewhat map-oriented. The exception I can think of is if the GM is anticipating a chase/flight scene - and so expects the players to be keeping track of their choices so that their PCs can retrace their steps without getting lost. (2), on the other hand, is completely standard for a wide range of play approaches. Classic D&D dungeons used to have "freeze frame" rooms - when the PCs arrive at the room the nymph is playing on her flute, or the dragon is asleep on its ledge, or the cultists are in the process of sacrificing the prisoners, or whatever. In the typical classic "freeze frame", the PCs have no causal connection to the events until they get there, though their may be an emotional connection (and likewise by the players): eg in another room the PCs may have acquired rumours of the prisoners, or learned that there is a musical nymph or a dragon in the dungeon. Adventure paths have "freeze frame" rooms or situations. In I6 Pharoah, for instance (somewhere on the border between a classic dungeon and an AP), the dervishes will be looking for their missing members [I]whenever[/I] the PCs arrive at the pyramid. I assume that Dragonlance, and the modern APs, are full of this sort of thing. I'm not running classic dungeoneering, nor APs, but would use a set-up like (2). For the reasons I've set out at length upthread, mostly in conversation with [MENTION=6775031]Saelorn[/MENTION], I think it would completely deprotagonise the players, who are searching for the prisoners, to have the prisoners killed off-screen. And if I wanted to make [I]time[/I] a factor, there are plenty of ways of incorporating that (eg via skill challenge) which would mean that the deaths didn't happen in a way disconnected from the players' knowing participation in the process of action resolution. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The Best Thing from 4E
Top