Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dungeoneer" data-source="post: 5384474" data-attributes="member: 91777">Look, I have created a program.&nbsp; It's called AutoThreadBaiter2.0.&nbsp; It doesn't really do anything useful, but I've written a EULA which says that I get to eat any pets you may have and that running the program signifies acceptance.If you use the program and don't let me eat your pets and I take you to court because &quot;we have a contract that states I'm allowed to eat your pets,&quot; will I win?This is an extreme example, but it points out the absurdity of this line of thinking.&nbsp; Corporations can put any kind of nonsense they want in their EULA, but it's not binding and is unlikely to stand up in a court of law.&nbsp; If WotC wants to take me or a bunch of SomethingAwful forumers to court and try their luck, that's their business rather than yours.&nbsp; In the meantime, this thread has gotten WAY off track.&nbsp; So: New Character Builder not as good as Old Character Builder.&nbsp; RAWR.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dungeoneer, post: 5384474, member: 91777"] Look, I have created a program. It's called AutoThreadBaiter2.0. It doesn't really do anything useful, but I've written a EULA which says that I get to eat any pets you may have and that running the program signifies acceptance. If you use the program and don't let me eat your pets and I take you to court because "we have a contract that states I'm allowed to eat your pets," will I win? This is an extreme example, but it points out the absurdity of this line of thinking. Corporations can put any kind of nonsense they want in their EULA, but it's not binding and is unlikely to stand up in a court of law. [I]If[/I] WotC wants to take me or a bunch of SomethingAwful forumers to court and try their luck, that's their business rather than yours. In the meantime, this thread has gotten WAY off track. So: New Character Builder not as good as Old Character Builder. RAWR. [/QUOTE]

Verification