Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Binder is fixed!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5760198" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>In a nutshell, its pact boon triggers when you either kill something or an enemy dies in a square adjacent to you. The chances of that happening (for a class that has no reason to get near an enemy otherwise) is unlikely at best. So you basically have a pact boon that triggers maybe a couple times a level. At which point you get to slide or teleport an enemy 3 squares. Wow! </p><p></p><p>Beyond that you just have powers and whatnot that are strictly in every sense inferior to a regular warlock, lock stock and barrel. A straight warlock can poach all your powers (some have riders, but honestly a lot of the riders aren't that great). </p><p></p><p>It is just really sub-par and you can get ALMOST everything the binder offers without being a binder. It isn't unplayable, there's just no reason TO play it. The class needs something. Basically it needs a pact boon that actually works. If you could trigger the boon 2-3 times per fight reliably it would start to at least have a good core control function. You'd probably still need something else to spice it up. At least a couple good solid feats that can't be poached by other 'locks. Something. </p><p></p><p>Honestly I think the root of the problem is that the concept is weak and the class lacks a real niche that it owns. It is supposed to be a 100% controller version of warlock, but regular 'locks are really not bad controllers if built in that direction, PLUS they're still going to dish out some respectable (and at high levels very impressive) damage. So there's just insufficient differentiation there to give it any real niche protection. On top of that we have the Mage/Arcanist, which is a bang-up arcane controller too. There's just not a compelling archetype for the class to be built around nor a role niche that needed to be filled. </p><p></p><p>I think it was a class concept that really should have been axed, but at some point they must have realized they had nothing else to go with and a book that needed to be wrapped, so they went with it. Sometimes things just don't gel and the binder just didn't gel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5760198, member: 82106"] In a nutshell, its pact boon triggers when you either kill something or an enemy dies in a square adjacent to you. The chances of that happening (for a class that has no reason to get near an enemy otherwise) is unlikely at best. So you basically have a pact boon that triggers maybe a couple times a level. At which point you get to slide or teleport an enemy 3 squares. Wow! Beyond that you just have powers and whatnot that are strictly in every sense inferior to a regular warlock, lock stock and barrel. A straight warlock can poach all your powers (some have riders, but honestly a lot of the riders aren't that great). It is just really sub-par and you can get ALMOST everything the binder offers without being a binder. It isn't unplayable, there's just no reason TO play it. The class needs something. Basically it needs a pact boon that actually works. If you could trigger the boon 2-3 times per fight reliably it would start to at least have a good core control function. You'd probably still need something else to spice it up. At least a couple good solid feats that can't be poached by other 'locks. Something. Honestly I think the root of the problem is that the concept is weak and the class lacks a real niche that it owns. It is supposed to be a 100% controller version of warlock, but regular 'locks are really not bad controllers if built in that direction, PLUS they're still going to dish out some respectable (and at high levels very impressive) damage. So there's just insufficient differentiation there to give it any real niche protection. On top of that we have the Mage/Arcanist, which is a bang-up arcane controller too. There's just not a compelling archetype for the class to be built around nor a role niche that needed to be filled. I think it was a class concept that really should have been axed, but at some point they must have realized they had nothing else to go with and a book that needed to be wrapped, so they went with it. Sometimes things just don't gel and the binder just didn't gel. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Binder is fixed!
Top