Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maggan" data-source="post: 3816946" data-attributes="member: 6616">Which touches upon another question I've been wondering about.I've been playing D&amp;D for 22 years. Long enough for some &quot;grognard&quot; cred, I think. I've spent tons of money on D&amp;D over the years; D&amp;D BECM, AD&amp;D 1st, AD&amp;D 2nd, D&amp;D3e and even other TSR games.I'm ready to embrace 4e as yet another option to run at the table. WotC aint losing my 22 years of GMing experience, and neither will it lose that of my friends, some who have been playing for close to 30 years.Which leads up to my question; is a grognard automatically hostile to the game? And if so, what do we call those GMs who have spend a fortune on the game, who have been playing for for than 20 years, and who are positive to the development of the game?And perhaps more importantly; how many of us are there, compared to what is normally characterised as a grognard?/M</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maggan, post: 3816946, member: 6616"] Which touches upon another question I've been wondering about. I've been playing D&D for 22 years. Long enough for some "grognard" cred, I think. I've spent tons of money on D&D over the years; D&D BECM, AD&D 1st, AD&D 2nd, D&D3e and even other TSR games. I'm ready to embrace 4e as yet another option to run at the table. WotC aint losing my 22 years of GMing experience, and neither will it lose that of my friends, some who have been playing for close to 30 years. Which leads up to my question; is a grognard automatically hostile to the game? And if so, what do we call those GMs who have spend a fortune on the game, who have been playing for for than 20 years, and who are positive to the development of the game? And perhaps more importantly; how many of us are there, compared to what is normally characterised as a grognard? /M [/QUOTE]

Verification