Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mallus" data-source="post: 4179820" data-attributes="member: 3887">It would if I were writing the MM. Mine would be packed with fun! (not to mention incredibly discursive and derivative...). Oh, me to. Just lazy in a different way. Honestly, I prefer not to codify details like that until it comes up in play and a players asks. Schroedinger's DM'ing, as my friend shilsen puts it. This way, the game surprises me as much as the it does the players (+5 seconds).Assuming the PC's are good, the scenario works best if you use good, pious and noble defenders (+3 seconds).CR/EL appropriate or lower knights, clerics and wizards work nicely. These opponents should be easy for the PC's to kill (+3 seconds).Up to the PC's. The pawns should be weak enough to make non-lethal tactics viable (+2 seconds).Probably not. Depends on whether the PC's leave a clear trail of dead King's Men behind them (+3 seconds). One might need to explain the legends of the silly monsters to the players ahead of time, yes.</blockquote>