Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 8030112" data-attributes="member: 87792">OK. As I see the alignment system:LG: If a child needs to steal a loaf of bread to eat the problem is the law. The law needs fixing. Try to fix it - but in the mean time pay for the bread - and for a dozen other loaves for urchins. And try to change the law to create an effective welfare state.NG: The first concern is to increase wellbeing and prevent harm. Let the kid go, possibly buy a loaf and don't haggle hard.CG: The primary concern is that the kid gets to eat. Let the kid go, creating a distraction if necessary. Don't turn him in - ACAB.LN: The priority is to uphold the law. Stop the child as long as you can do it without breaking the law yourself or threatening to seriously injure the child.TN: Not my loaf, not my urchin, not my business.CN: Cause confusion that will help the kid get away. It's a good excuse.LE: Stop the child by any legal means necessary. Make sure he is turned over to the cops - they know what to do with this sort of kid.NE: Use the urchin as a distraction to rob the bread merchant. After all the kid doesn't have anything worth stealing.CE: How can this be escalated to leave someone dead?Throwing a warhammer at a kid's legs comes under the LE heading - possibly moved to LN by checking with the DM that it wouldn't harm the kid.</blockquote>