Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TerraDave" data-source="post: 5945198" data-attributes="member: 22260">With about 160 votes....Wizard&nbsp; &nbsp; 123&nbsp; &nbsp; 77.36%Fighter&nbsp; &nbsp; 119&nbsp; &nbsp; 74.84%Rogue/Thief 112&nbsp; &nbsp; 70.44%Ranger&nbsp; &nbsp; 105&nbsp; &nbsp; 66.04%Cleric&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 100&nbsp; &nbsp; 62.89%Paladin&nbsp; &nbsp; 94&nbsp; &nbsp; 59.12%Sorcerer&nbsp; &nbsp; 94&nbsp; &nbsp; 59.12%Druid&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 90&nbsp; &nbsp; 56.60%Bard&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 89&nbsp; &nbsp; 55.97%Monk&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 83&nbsp; &nbsp; 52.20%Warlord/Marshal&nbsp; &nbsp; 80&nbsp; &nbsp; 50.31%Warlock&nbsp; &nbsp; 76&nbsp; &nbsp; 47.80%Assassin&nbsp; &nbsp; 70&nbsp; &nbsp; 44.03%Barbarian/Berserker&nbsp; &nbsp; 66&nbsp; &nbsp; 41.51%Psion&nbsp; &nbsp; 53&nbsp; &nbsp; 33.33%(other) Arcane specialist&nbsp; &nbsp; 48&nbsp; &nbsp; 30.19%Illusionist&nbsp; &nbsp; 47&nbsp; &nbsp; 29.56%Cavalier/Knight&nbsp; &nbsp; 43&nbsp; &nbsp; 27.04%(other) Priest&nbsp; &nbsp; 41&nbsp; &nbsp; 25.79%Other (please note)&nbsp; &nbsp; 29&nbsp; &nbsp; 18.24%Elf&nbsp; &nbsp; 28&nbsp; &nbsp; 17.61%Dwarf&nbsp; &nbsp; 19&nbsp; &nbsp; 11.95%Halfling&nbsp; &nbsp; 13&nbsp; &nbsp; 8.18%While my whole hypothesis was based on &quot;signficant minority&quot; if we used the 50% cut off, getting the warlord, monk, bard, sorcerer and the rest in there, I would be pretty happy with that, though I wouldn't mind the barbarian, assassin and warlock as well.On the sorcerer in particular, I see this as a clear call for a non-vancian (or semi vancian? flex-vancian) core caster...could be interesting to see what they do with it. (some kind of bloodlines/power origin?).As for the psion and the others...they might come latter. And for the other &quot;others&quot; which people have posted on....I am not seeing a swordmage/bladesinger or artificer in the core, (though I could see options for that sort of character) but thats what supplements are for.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TerraDave, post: 5945198, member: 22260"] With about 160 votes.... Wizard 123 77.36% Fighter 119 74.84% Rogue/Thief 112 70.44% Ranger 105 66.04% Cleric 100 62.89% Paladin 94 59.12% Sorcerer 94 59.12% Druid 90 56.60% Bard 89 55.97% Monk 83 52.20% Warlord/Marshal 80 50.31% Warlock 76 47.80% Assassin 70 44.03% Barbarian/Berserker 66 41.51% Psion 53 33.33% (other) Arcane specialist 48 30.19% Illusionist 47 29.56% Cavalier/Knight 43 27.04% (other) Priest 41 25.79% Other (please note) 29 18.24% Elf 28 17.61% Dwarf 19 11.95% Halfling 13 8.18% While my whole hypothesis was based on "signficant minority" if we used the 50% cut off, getting the warlord, monk, bard, sorcerer and the rest in there, I would be pretty happy with that, though I wouldn't mind the barbarian, assassin and warlock as well. On the sorcerer in particular, I see this as a clear call for a non-vancian (or semi vancian? flex-vancian) core caster...could be interesting to see what they do with it. (some kind of bloodlines/power origin?). As for the psion and the others...they might come latter. And for the other "others" which people have posted on....I am not seeing a swordmage/bladesinger or artificer in the core, (though I could see options for that sort of character) but thats what supplements are for. [/QUOTE]

Verification