Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GSHamster" data-source="post: 1703741" data-attributes="member: 20187">Half of the places in the world, maybe.&nbsp; However, these places collectively contain a very small number of people. (Certainly less than 50%.)If the question is: &quot;What percentage of the people do not have access to 2nd level spells?&quot;, I'd suggest that the answer is much lower than 50%.If you have 9 hamlets with 11 people each, and one village with 900 people and a 3rd level cleric, you could say:1. 90% of all places do not have access to 2nd level spells.2. 10% of all people do not have access to 2nd level spells.I think that option 2 is a more meaningful option, at least in the context of this discussion. (The numbers are made up to illustrate the argument. I don't have a DMG at the moment to give real numbers.)That's the only flaw I see in your argument, though.&nbsp; It was an interesting read.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="GSHamster, post: 1703741, member: 20187"] Half of the [b]places[/b] in the world, maybe. However, these places collectively contain a very small number of [b]people[/b]. (Certainly less than 50%.) If the question is: "What percentage of the [b]people[/b] do not have access to 2nd level spells?", I'd suggest that the answer is much lower than 50%. If you have 9 hamlets with 11 people each, and one village with 900 people and a 3rd level cleric, you could say: 1. 90% of all places do not have access to 2nd level spells. 2. 10% of all people do not have access to 2nd level spells. I think that option 2 is a more meaningful option, at least in the context of this discussion. (The numbers are made up to illustrate the argument. I don't have a DMG at the moment to give real numbers.) That's the only flaw I see in your argument, though. It was an interesting read. [/QUOTE]

Verification