Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nikosandros" data-source="post: 4611047" data-attributes="member: 7993">Yes, of course. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />My point was that if 3 different sources are covered in PHB3 than it won't contain at least 4 classes for two different power sources.Let's say, for the sake of argument, that shadow and psionic are in PHB3 with 4 classes each. This means that Psionic Power and Shadow Power can be published in 2010. On the other hand, if at least a class with, say, an elemental power source is published in place of a shadow class, then Shadow Power would have to wait until 2011.Now there are a lot of assumption in my point, that's for sure. WotC might be fine with publishing only a power book in 2010 because they have something else planned.&nbsp; PHB3 might contain more or less than 8 classes. A power book might be published with support for less than 4 classes. Still, I feel that all those assumptions are not unreasonable...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nikosandros, post: 4611047, member: 7993"] Yes, of course. :) My point was that if 3 different sources are covered in PHB3 than it won't contain at least 4 classes for two different power sources. Let's say, for the sake of argument, that shadow and psionic are in PHB3 with 4 classes each. This means that Psionic Power and Shadow Power can be published in 2010. On the other hand, if at least a class with, say, an elemental power source is published in place of a shadow class, then Shadow Power would have to wait until 2011. Now there are a lot of assumption in my point, that's for sure. WotC might be fine with publishing only a power book in 2010 because they have something else planned. PHB3 might contain more or less than 8 classes. A power book might be published with support for less than 4 classes. Still, I feel that all those assumptions are not unreasonable... [/QUOTE]

Verification