Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4210551" data-attributes="member: 710">What if you where, say, sitting on Queen Elizabeth Throne? Would you come up with more or with less archetypes? Current theory probably looks like this: I think group synergy is the new rules mastery that you can achieve in 4E. You won't be able to build a useless character, but you can still play him like one. Or you can optimize the teamwork. If the Controller affects more targets then any other class, it makes sense to reason that the potential for synergies are even higher, and mastering them is possible. Time will tell if it's really true.But, Kamikaze Midget, could you please stop defending and soundly explaining 4E design concepts? I had already filed you under 4E hater, and my drawer only really supports two files. I don't want to create a file for some &quot;likes some, dislikes other&quot;-<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />. I am a software developer, I only support the binary system.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 4210551, member: 710"] What if you where, say, sitting on Queen Elizabeth Throne? Would you come up with more or with less archetypes? Current theory probably looks like this: I think group synergy is the new rules mastery that you can achieve in 4E. You won't be able to build a useless character, but you can still play him like one. Or you can optimize the teamwork. If the Controller affects more targets then any other class, it makes sense to reason that the potential for synergies are even higher, and mastering them is possible. Time will tell if it's really true. But, Kamikaze Midget, could you please stop defending and soundly explaining 4E design concepts? I had already filed you under 4E hater, and my drawer only really supports two files. I don't want to create a file for some "likes some, dislikes other"-:):):):):):):):). I am a software developer, I only support the binary system. [/QUOTE]

Verification