Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9170114" data-attributes="member: 6790260">Don't care. Having something is better than next-to-nothing--which is what we got all through 3.x and through the vast majority of 5e.Spellcasters get spells--usually several--with every major release.You don't see how there might be an ongoing problem caused by constantly pumping spellcasters full of additional options--especially Wizards, who almost always get access to the new spells--while leaving non-casters in the dust essentially all the time? (Edit: To back up this assertion, I checked. Of the 152 new spells added to 5e--aka more than 15 new spells every year on average!--only 39 are inaccessible to Wizards. Meaning, on average, the Wizard has gotten around 11 new spells per year every year since 5e was published. Of course, almost all of them were in XGtE, with 77 new spells for Wizards. But, the point stands--when spells are added, they're almost always Wizard spells.)The one and only book that added any new Battle Master maneuvers was Tasha's. In literally a decade of publishing books, we got one book that gave Battle Masters more options. The vast majority of new feats are either race-specific or purely for spellcasters.One side of this equation is getting the lion's share of the support here, and it isn't the martial side.</blockquote>