Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Core Mechanic and DCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Herremann the Wise" data-source="post: 5898620" data-attributes="member: 11300"><p>I think this could be solved using a similar system of auto-success but related to the nurture side of things rather than nature. Imagine if based on training, a character's skill was rated:</p><p></p><p>• Unfamiliar/Hampered</p><p>• Familiar</p><p>• Proficient </p><p>• Expert</p><p>• Specialist</p><p>• Master</p><p></p><p>In this way a ranger who is an expert in Woodlore (that is based on a secondary ability modifer: wisdom) can accomplish many things automatically simply because they are an expert in that field. Likewise for any character who is well-trained but perhaps behind in raw ability, this becomes a method of automatic resolution.</p><p></p><p>The other feature that I like about this is that it allows you to differentiate between skills that might be heavily skewed to either nature or nurture. For example, jumping is much more related to raw strength and dexterity, with training not having as much influence. Such skills will focus on natural ability scores (rather than training) for automatic resolution bypassing the core mechanic. Alternatively, skills based much more on "nurture" or training such as Arcane Lore, will have training based capacity such as "expert" or "specialist" be what is required for automatic success and resolution. I think this would work rather nicely in representing different skills where as ability score alone fails to represent training heavy skills such as the appraisal of obscure items, disabling traps, the mundane but highly skilled healing of severely injured characters, highly gymnastic manoeuvres and so on.</p><p></p><p>Best Regards</p><p>Herremann the Wise</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Herremann the Wise, post: 5898620, member: 11300"] I think this could be solved using a similar system of auto-success but related to the nurture side of things rather than nature. Imagine if based on training, a character's skill was rated: • Unfamiliar/Hampered • Familiar • Proficient • Expert • Specialist • Master In this way a ranger who is an expert in Woodlore (that is based on a secondary ability modifer: wisdom) can accomplish many things automatically simply because they are an expert in that field. Likewise for any character who is well-trained but perhaps behind in raw ability, this becomes a method of automatic resolution. The other feature that I like about this is that it allows you to differentiate between skills that might be heavily skewed to either nature or nurture. For example, jumping is much more related to raw strength and dexterity, with training not having as much influence. Such skills will focus on natural ability scores (rather than training) for automatic resolution bypassing the core mechanic. Alternatively, skills based much more on "nurture" or training such as Arcane Lore, will have training based capacity such as "expert" or "specialist" be what is required for automatic success and resolution. I think this would work rather nicely in representing different skills where as ability score alone fails to represent training heavy skills such as the appraisal of obscure items, disabling traps, the mundane but highly skilled healing of severely injured characters, highly gymnastic manoeuvres and so on. Best Regards Herremann the Wise [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Core Mechanic and DCs
Top