Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Giltonio_Santos" data-source="post: 6302597" data-attributes="member: 36874">When I compare D&D and Pathfinder, my conclusion is that WotC is free to charge more for their product based in a simple fact: I want to play D&D 5E, not Pathfinder. Those two are very different games, and I don't care that I could be paying $20 less for a product that I won't buy anyway.To me, every RPG is its own experience. Some of them I want to play, some of them I don't want to, but I strongly believe that the publisher of a game should price it based in what they believe the experience they're delivering is worth; how other games are priced is a non-issue, as long as you manage to find the sweet spot between how much you want for that experience and how much those who are looking forward to it are willing to pay.The success of 5E will be all about their ability to actually deliver the $150 game they're trying to sell us. I know that Pathfinder isn't worth its $90 to me, and one could say that those extra $60 are the amount WotC needed to design a game that I want to run/play.That said, I'm still sorry for those who want to run/play this awesome game, but don't have the money to afford the rulebooks. I hope they end up playing anyway.Cheers!</blockquote>