Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Crab Bucket Fallacy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9136622" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>That's not a citation. That's an assertion. Because-</p><p></p><p>1. You don't actually supply any data; and</p><p>2. You don't know what the internal numbers and deliberations were; and most importantly</p><p>3. The people who were part of the playtest were not "fans" of 5e (because it was a playtest, not the final game). They were a subset of players at that time, and they are a miniscule amount of the people playing 5e currently!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, citation needed. Do you have any actual data, surveys, numbers? Or is this just an assertion?</p><p></p><p>In addition, there are already <em>three</em> non-magical warriors; the fighter, the barbarian, and the monk. So if you're expanding the ambit of your idea to warriors, you also have to include those archetypes as well.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Um, when a 3PP makes <em>any player content, </em>they are going to make a variant of the already-existing class. Because that is, by definition, what 3PP variants are. They aren't going to publish <em>the same thing that is already published by WoTC.</em></p><p></p><p></p><p>Look, I get it. We all think that our own preferences are more universal than they actually are. But just because you want something, doesn't mean that either (a) it's going to happen, or (b) it's what everyone else wants.</p><p></p><p>I want Bards excised from D&D with extreme prejudice. I want spellcasters nerfed so hard, they won't even see the next nerf hitting them. I want much slower healing ("gritty realism"). I want WoTC to just put out a Greyhawk supplement already. I want them to release a real psionic class, maybe based off the last decent iteration of the Mystic.</p><p></p><p>There's a lot of things I want, but I don't presume to speak for the D&D community or believe that my preferences are the same as all of the D&D community (or even the majority of it). To the extent I want things that WoTC isn't providing, I can either-</p><p>1. Do nothing.</p><p>2. Use 3PP.</p><p>3. Homebrew / houserrule / optional rule my way around it.</p><p></p><p>But I don't insist that my preferences are universal. As I have written before, some people like wuxia fighters that leap hundreds of feet in the air and smite titans in their face with their 20' long swords, and other people want grounded and realistic martial characters. There's no wrong answer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 9136622, member: 7023840"] That's not a citation. That's an assertion. Because- 1. You don't actually supply any data; and 2. You don't know what the internal numbers and deliberations were; and most importantly 3. The people who were part of the playtest were not "fans" of 5e (because it was a playtest, not the final game). They were a subset of players at that time, and they are a miniscule amount of the people playing 5e currently! Again, citation needed. Do you have any actual data, surveys, numbers? Or is this just an assertion? In addition, there are already [I]three[/I] non-magical warriors; the fighter, the barbarian, and the monk. So if you're expanding the ambit of your idea to warriors, you also have to include those archetypes as well. Um, when a 3PP makes [I]any player content, [/I]they are going to make a variant of the already-existing class. Because that is, by definition, what 3PP variants are. They aren't going to publish [I]the same thing that is already published by WoTC.[/I] Look, I get it. We all think that our own preferences are more universal than they actually are. But just because you want something, doesn't mean that either (a) it's going to happen, or (b) it's what everyone else wants. I want Bards excised from D&D with extreme prejudice. I want spellcasters nerfed so hard, they won't even see the next nerf hitting them. I want much slower healing ("gritty realism"). I want WoTC to just put out a Greyhawk supplement already. I want them to release a real psionic class, maybe based off the last decent iteration of the Mystic. There's a lot of things I want, but I don't presume to speak for the D&D community or believe that my preferences are the same as all of the D&D community (or even the majority of it). To the extent I want things that WoTC isn't providing, I can either- 1. Do nothing. 2. Use 3PP. 3. Homebrew / houserrule / optional rule my way around it. But I don't insist that my preferences are universal. As I have written before, some people like wuxia fighters that leap hundreds of feet in the air and smite titans in their face with their 20' long swords, and other people want grounded and realistic martial characters. There's no wrong answer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Crab Bucket Fallacy
Top